Chelsea Wemyss (32)

Batting – Middle-Order Batter U18 (2011/12) VIC
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings 🎥 Video 12
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: Melbourne Cricket Club · Metropolitan Inner South East · Metropolitan South East
Age: Born on/after 1 Sep 1993 (inferred from U18 eligibility, 2011/12 season)
Green Shield: 0 season(s) played · last GS year 2009/10 (ages out of U16 after this)
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Needs Work
2/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Needs Work
0/100
Batting
Not enough data
Bowling
Not enough data

Representative pathway — 4 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Premier or state pathway — 3 matches (+1.2)
  • ● Body of work — 134 imported matches (+2.7)

Critical recommendations

high Batting
Getting starts but not surviving

Adjusted average of 11.8 over 82 innings. Focus on the first 15 balls: leave/defend percentages, judgement outside off stump.

medium Bowling
Tight but not threatening

Economy of 3.65 is excellent but a wicket every 50 balls is slow. Develop a genuine wicket-taking variation and attack the stumps more.

medium Fielding
Low overall fielding impact

0.21 dismissals per match across 134 matches. Add direct-hit and ground-fielding reps to turn half-chances into run outs.

Strengths

How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 0 × 40% · Batting not rated (weight redistributed) · Bowling not rated (weight redistributed). Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.60 for the level played (2nd grade 3). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
Rated on the last 3 matches since 26 Oct 2024. Older cricket still shows in the career figures but does not count.
Fielding
Outfield: 22 catches + 6 run outs (5 direct, 1 assisted) in 134 matches — 0.21 per match.
Batting
Not rated: 82 innings at 11.8 average — below the 20 floor needed to be presented as a batter.
Bowling
Not rated: 54 wickets from 453.2 overs across 93 matches bowled in (of 134 played) — 0.58 per match, under the 0.25 floor. Bowls too rarely to judge.

Fielding — imported matches (134)

22
Ct (field)
0
Ct (WK)
0.16
Catches / match
5
RO (direct)
1
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
28
Total dismissals
0.21
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

770
Runs (82 inns)
11.8
Avg (adj)
47.97
Strike rate
53
High score
21
Not outs
5
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

54
Wickets (453.2 ov)
3.65
Economy
30.63
Average
55
Maidens
0.3
Extras / over
50.4
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 134 imported
Batting 770 runs in 82 inns @ 11.8 (SR 47.97)
Milestones 0×100, 1×50, HS 53, 8 ducks
Bowling 54 wkts @ 30.63 (econ 3.65, SR 50.4)
Best / 5WI 3-10 · 0 five-fors
Fielding 22 ct, 6 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 28 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

0.16
Catches / match
0.21
Dismissals / match

Across 134 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2023/24 4 1 28 11* 8.75 42.42 0 0
2022/23 9 3 95 31* 14.07 49.74 0 0
2021/22 4 1 31 23 9.69 106.9 0 0
2020/21 9 1 116 37 14.32 61.38 0 0
2019/20 17 2 221 53 14.53 58.47 1 0
2018/19 12 2 116 26* 11.28 58.88 0 0
2017/18 9 3 48 28 7.11 39.34 0 0
2016/17 4 0 16 5 4 31.37 0 0
2015/16 8 4 85 30* 15.94 60.71 0 0
2014/15 1 1 0 0* 0 0 0 0
2012/13 3 1 6 5 2.67 17.65 0 0
2009/10 1 1 1 1* 1 — 0 0
2007/08 1 1 7 7* 7 — 0 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2023/24 10.3 1 33 1 33 3.19 62
2022/23 50 8 214 5 42.8 4.28 60
2021/22 68.8 10 202 6 33.67 2.93 68.8
2020/21 46.5 7 136 8 17 2.92 34.9
2019/20 77.5 10 273 13 21 3.52 35.8
2018/19 41 6 177 3 59 4.32 82
2017/18 90 10 279 12 23.25 3.1 45
2016/17 54.3 2 247 4 61.75 4.55 81.5
2015/16 1 0 8 0 — 8 —
2012/13 8.7 0 71 0 — 8.19 —
2009/10 2 0 11 0 — 5.5 —
2007/08 3 1 3 2 1.5 1 9

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2023/24 2 0 1 0 3
2022/23 3 0 1 0 4
2021/22 4 0 0 0 4
2020/21 1 0 0 0 1
2019/20 4 0 0 0 4
2018/19 2 0 0 0 2
2017/18 2 0 1 0 3
2016/17 2 0 1 0 3
2015/16 1 0 1 0 2
2014/15 1 0 0 0 1
2013/14 0 0 1 0 1
Pathway benchmark

How does Chelsea compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.