Representative pathway — 4 pathway points in the overall rating
● Premier or state pathway — 3 matches (+1.2)
● Body of work — 134 imported matches (+2.7)
Critical recommendations
highBatting
Getting starts but not surviving
Adjusted average of 11.8 over 82 innings. Focus on the first 15 balls: leave/defend percentages, judgement outside off stump.
mediumBowling
Tight but not threatening
Economy of 3.65 is excellent but a wicket every 50 balls is slow. Develop a genuine wicket-taking variation and attack the stumps more.
mediumFielding
Low overall fielding impact
0.21 dismissals per match across 134 matches. Add direct-hit and ground-fielding reps to turn half-chances into run outs.
Strengths
How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 0 × 40% · Batting not rated (weight redistributed) · Bowling not rated (weight redistributed). Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.60 for the level played (2nd grade 3). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
Rated on the last 3 matches since 26 Oct 2024. Older cricket still shows in the career figures but does not count.
Fielding
Outfield: 22 catches + 6 run outs (5 direct, 1 assisted) in 134 matches — 0.21 per match.
Batting
Not rated: 82 innings at 11.8 average — below the 20 floor needed to be presented as a batter.
Bowling
Not rated: 54 wickets from 453.2 overs across 93 matches bowled in (of 134 played) — 0.58 per match, under the 0.25 floor. Bowls too rarely to judge.
Fielding — imported matches (134)
22
Ct (field)
0
Ct (WK)
0.16
Catches / match
5
RO (direct)
1
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
28
Total dismissals
0.21
Dismissals / match
Batting — imported matches
770
Runs (82 inns)
11.8
Avg (adj)
47.97
Strike rate
53
High score
21
Not outs
5
Median position
Century (100+)Fifty (50–99)Not out (under 50)Out (under 50)
Bowling — imported matches
54
Wickets (453.2 ov)
3.65
Economy
30.63
Average
55
Maidens
0.3
Extras / over
50.4
Strike rate
Dismissal pattern
Imported-match summary
Matches
134 imported
Batting
770 runs in 82 inns @ 11.8 (SR 47.97)
Milestones
0×100, 1×50, HS 53, 8 ducks
Bowling
54 wkts @ 30.63 (econ 3.65, SR 50.4)
Best / 5WI
3-10 · 0 five-fors
Fielding
22 ct, 6 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.
Further analysis
Batting form
Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).
Score distribution
How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.
Scoring tempo
Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.
Bowling form
Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.
Wicket accumulation
Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.
Fielding contribution
Breakdown of the 28 dismissals they were involved in.
Per-match fielding rate
0.16
Catches / match
0.21
Dismissals / match
Across 134 imported match(es).
Season by season
Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.
Batting
Season
Inns
NO
Runs
HS
Avg
SR
50
100
2023/24
4
1
28
11*
8.75
42.42
0
0
2022/23
9
3
95
31*
14.07
49.74
0
0
2021/22
4
1
31
23
9.69
106.9
0
0
2020/21
9
1
116
37
14.32
61.38
0
0
2019/20
17
2
221
53
14.53
58.47
1
0
2018/19
12
2
116
26*
11.28
58.88
0
0
2017/18
9
3
48
28
7.11
39.34
0
0
2016/17
4
0
16
5
4
31.37
0
0
2015/16
8
4
85
30*
15.94
60.71
0
0
2014/15
1
1
0
0*
0
0
0
0
2012/13
3
1
6
5
2.67
17.65
0
0
2009/10
1
1
1
1*
1
—
0
0
2007/08
1
1
7
7*
7
—
0
0
Bowling
Season
Overs
Mdns
Runs
Wkts
Avg
Econ
SR
2023/24
10.3
1
33
1
33
3.19
62
2022/23
50
8
214
5
42.8
4.28
60
2021/22
68.8
10
202
6
33.67
2.93
68.8
2020/21
46.5
7
136
8
17
2.92
34.9
2019/20
77.5
10
273
13
21
3.52
35.8
2018/19
41
6
177
3
59
4.32
82
2017/18
90
10
279
12
23.25
3.1
45
2016/17
54.3
2
247
4
61.75
4.55
81.5
2015/16
1
0
8
0
—
8
—
2012/13
8.7
0
71
0
—
8.19
—
2009/10
2
0
11
0
—
5.5
—
2007/08
3
1
3
2
1.5
1
9
Fielding
Season
Ct
WK Ct
RO
St
Dismissals
2023/24
2
0
1
0
3
2022/23
3
0
1
0
4
2021/22
4
0
0
0
4
2020/21
1
0
0
0
1
2019/20
4
0
0
0
4
2018/19
2
0
0
0
2
2017/18
2
0
1
0
3
2016/17
2
0
1
0
3
2015/16
1
0
1
0
2
2014/15
1
0
0
0
1
2013/14
0
0
1
0
1
Pathway benchmark
How does Chelsea compare?
Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.