Kai Glennie

Batting – Lower-Order Batter NSW Anchor / accumulator
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: Roseville Cricket Club · Fine Legs XI Cricket Club · Pennant Hills Cricket Club
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Needs Work
4/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Needs Work
27/100
Batting Working on Basics
not rated — working on basics
Bowling
Not enough data

Representative pathway — 0 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Body of work — 18 imported matches (+0.4)

Critical recommendations

high Batting
Getting starts but not surviving

Adjusted average of 5.0 over 20 innings. Focus on the first 15 balls: leave/defend percentages, judgement outside off stump.

medium Batting
High duck rate

Out for 0 in 20% of imported innings. Build a repeatable start routine: watch the ball out of the hand, score first run with low-risk pushes.

Strengths

How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 27 × 40% · Batting not rated (weight redistributed) · Bowling not rated (weight redistributed). Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.30 for the level played (Club 18). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
No match in the last 2 years, so not ranked. The rating shown is from the career.
Fielding
Outfield: 5 catches + 0 run outs (0 direct, 0 assisted) in 18 matches — 0.28 per match.
Batting
Not rated: 20 innings at 5.0 average — below the 20 floor needed to be presented as a batter.
Bowling
Not rated: 7 wickets from 52.0 overs across 12 matches bowled in (of 18 played) — 0.58 per match, under the 0.25 floor. Bowls too rarely to judge.

Fielding — imported matches (18)

5
Ct (field)
0
Ct (WK)
0.28
Catches / match
0
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
5
Total dismissals
0.28
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

86
Runs (20 inns)
4.95
Avg (adj)
29.73
Strike rate
24
High score
3
Not outs
8
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

7
Wickets (52 ov)
5.4
Economy
40.14
Average
5
Maidens
0.37
Extras / over
44.6
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 18 imported
Batting 86 runs in 20 inns @ 4.95 (SR 29.73)
Milestones 0×100, 0×50, HS 24, 4 ducks
Bowling 7 wkts @ 40.14 (econ 5.4, SR 44.6)
Best / 5WI 4-50 · 0 five-fors
Fielding 5 ct, 0 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 5 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

0.28
Catches / match
0.28
Dismissals / match

Across 18 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2018/19 5 0 38 24 7.6 135.71 0 0
2017/18 5 1 23 16 5.52 255.56 0 0
2016/17 6 2 10 6 2.22 — 0 0
2015/16 1 0 0 0 0 — 0 0
2014/15 3 0 15 14 5 — 0 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2018/19 5 0 21 1 21 4.2 30
2017/18 19 3 122 4 30.5 6.42 28.5
2016/17 12 0 62 0 — 5.17 —
2015/16 8 2 35 0 — 4.38 —
2014/15 8 0 41 2 20.5 5.13 24

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2018/19 2 0 0 0 2
2017/18 1 0 0 0 1
2015/16 1 0 0 0 1
2014/15 1 0 0 0 1
Pathway benchmark

How does Kai compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.