Will English

Bowling – Opening Bowler
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: Dubbo Newtown Cricket Club Inc.
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Needs Work
7/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Needs Work
12/100
Batting Proficient
33/100
Bowling Advance
65/100

Representative pathway — 0 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Body of work — 12 imported matches (+0.2)

Critical recommendations

high Batting
Vulnerable to the straight ball

3 of 6 dismissals are bowled/LBW — likely playing across the front pad or leaving a gate. Work on a straighter bat path and head position over the ball.

high Fielding
Catching return too low for selection

Only 0.08 catches per match over 12 matches. Fielding is the first thing selectors compare when batting/bowling are close — make catching the priority: 30 high balls + 30 flat catches per session, and ask to field in the ring/slips where chances come.

medium Batting
High duck rate

Out for 0 in 12% of imported innings. Build a repeatable start routine: watch the ball out of the hand, score first run with low-risk pushes.

Strengths

  • ✓ Genuine wicket-taker — bowling average of 10.8.
  • ✓ Builds pressure with a tight economy of 2.49.
How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 12 × 40% · Batting 33 × 30% · Bowling 65 × 30%. Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.30 for the level played (Club 12). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
No match in the last 2 years, so not ranked. The rating shown is from the career.
Fielding
Outfield: 1 catches + 0 run outs (0 direct, 0 assisted) in 12 matches — 0.08 per match.
Batting
126 runs in 8 innings, adjusted average 19.7. Qualifies on the floors (avg ≥ 20, SR ≥ 40).
Bowling
9 wickets in 11 matches bowled in (of 12 played) — 0.82 per match at 10.8, economy 2.49, strike rate 26.0.

Fielding — imported matches (12)

1
Ct (field)
0
Ct (WK)
0.08
Catches / match
0
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
1
Total dismissals
0.08
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

126
Runs (8 inns)
19.69
Avg (adj)
—
Strike rate
31
High score
2
Not outs
8
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

9
Wickets (39 ov)
2.49
Economy
10.78
Average
8
Maidens
0.13
Extras / over
26
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 12 imported
Batting 126 runs in 8 inns @ 19.69 (SR —)
Milestones 0×100, 0×50, HS 31, 1 ducks
Bowling 9 wkts @ 10.78 (econ 2.49, SR 26)
Best / 5WI 4-8 · 0 five-fors
Fielding 1 ct, 0 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 1 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

0.08
Catches / match
0.08
Dismissals / match

Across 12 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2014/15 1 1 19 19* 19 — 0 0
2013/14 7 1 107 31 17.47 — 0 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2014/15 4 1 4 0 — 1 —
2013/14 35 7 93 9 10.33 2.66 23.3

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2013/14 1 0 0 0 1
Pathway benchmark

How does Will compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.