Nathan Gould

Bowling – Opening Bowler QLD
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Likely same player — one-click merge
play.cricket
Nathan Gould
QLD · 13 matches · 100% match
play.cricket
Nathan Gould
— · 1 matches · 25% match
play.cricket
Nathan Gould
— · 1 matches · 25% match
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: Sandgate - Redcliffe DCC · The Lakes Knights Cricket Club · Burpengary
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Needs Work
0/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Needs Work
0/100
Batting Working on Basics
not rated — working on basics
Bowling Proficient
57/100

Representative pathway — 0 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Body of work — 15 imported matches (+0.3)

Critical recommendations

high Batting
Strike rotation needs urgent work

Strike rate of 62.5 means long dot-ball chains and pressure on partners. Drill singles into gaps, soft-hand placement, and calling.

high Fielding
Catching return too low for selection

Only 0.00 catches per match over 15 matches. Fielding is the first thing selectors compare when batting/bowling are close — make catching the priority: 30 high balls + 30 flat catches per session, and ask to field in the ring/slips where chances come.

Strengths

  • ✓ Genuine wicket-taker — bowling average of 15.6.
  • ✓ Builds pressure with a tight economy of 2.72.
How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 0 × 40% · Batting not rated (weight redistributed) · Bowling 57 × 30%. Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.30 for the level played (Club 15). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
No match in the last 2 years, so not ranked. The rating shown is from the career.
Fielding
Outfield: 0 catches + 0 run outs (0 direct, 0 assisted) in 15 matches — 0.00 per match.
Batting
Not rated: 11 innings at 31.5 average — below the 20 floor needed to be presented as a batter.
Bowling
23 wickets in 13 matches bowled in (of 15 played) — 1.77 per match at 15.6, economy 2.72, strike rate 34.4.

Fielding — imported matches (15)

0
Ct (field)
0
Ct (WK)
0
Catches / match
0
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
0
Total dismissals
0
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

272
Runs (11 inns)
31.47
Avg (adj)
62.5
Strike rate
96
High score
3
Not outs
8
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

23
Wickets (132 ov)
2.72
Economy
15.61
Average
12
Maidens
0.05
Extras / over
34.4
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 15 imported
Batting 272 runs in 11 inns @ 31.47 (SR 62.5)
Milestones 0×100, 2×50, HS 96, 1 ducks
Bowling 23 wkts @ 15.61 (econ 2.72, SR 34.4)
Best / 5WI 4-28 · 0 five-fors
Fielding 0 ct, 0 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2013/14 1 0 0 0 0 — 0 0
2010/11 3 1 68 28 30.22 — 0 0
2009/10 1 0 14 14 14 — 0 0
2008/09 3 0 28 13 9.33 — 0 0
2006/07 3 2 162 96* 90 675 2 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2022/23 6 1 17 0 — 2.83 —
2020/21 2 0 5 0 — 2.5 —
2013/14 10 1 33 4 8.25 3.3 15
2010/11 52 0 119 9 13.22 2.29 34.7
2009/10 16 6 30 0 — 1.88 —
2008/09 23 0 60 4 15 2.61 34.5
2006/07 23 4 95 6 15.83 4.13 23
Pathway benchmark

How does Nathan compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.