🏅🥈 Tom Healy (29)

★ Div 1 Rep Fielding – Wicketkeeper-Batter U19 (2015/16) QLD Anchor / accumulator
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings 🎥 Video 65
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Likely same player — one-click merge
play.cricket
Tom Healy
QLD · 7 matches · 25% match
play.cricket
Tom Healy
— · 1 matches · 25% match
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: Australia · Metropolitan South West - Representative · Souths Junior Cricket Club · QLD · Northern Suburbs District Cricket Club · Robscan Knight Riders · KFC T/20 Challenge · South East Queensland Cricket Inc
Age: Born on/after 1 Sep 1996 (inferred from U19 eligibility, 2015/16 season)
Green Shield: 0 season(s) played · last GS year 2012/13 (ages out of U16 after this)
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
🏏 Century highlight
136* off 146
Men's First Grade Competition · 2017/18 · 10×4, 4×6 · SR 93

Ball-by-ball detail isn't available for this match, so the innings worm and shot breakdown aren't shown.

Overall Elite
77/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Elite
99/100
Batting Proficient
51/100
Bowling
Not enough data

Representative pathway — 49 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● State representation (+12)
  • ● Division 1 representative (+4)
  • ● National championships — 30 matches (+14.0)
  • ● Premier or state pathway — 202 matches (+10.0)
  • ● Regional representative — 32 matches (+4.0)
  • ● Body of work — 284 imported matches (+5.0)

Critical recommendations

high Batting
Strike rotation needs urgent work

Strike rate of 56.9 means long dot-ball chains and pressure on partners. Drill singles into gaps, soft-hand placement, and calling.

medium Batting
High duck rate

Out for 0 in 11% of imported innings. Build a repeatable start routine: watch the ball out of the hand, score first run with low-risk pushes.

medium Batting
Not converting fifties into hundreds

Only 9% of 50+ scores become hundreds (30 fifties, 3 hundreds). Practise batting in long blocks and resetting targets at 50.

info Fielding
Fielding is a selection weapon

1.34 catches per match is elite for this level — keep it visible by taking the hardest catching positions in big games.

Strengths

  • ✓ Proven ability to go big — 3 hundred(s), best of 136.
  • ✓ Safe hands — 381 catches in 284 matches (1.34 per match), a genuine selection asset.
  • ✓ Sharp glovework — 48 stumpings.
How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 99 × 40% · Batting 51 × 30% · Bowling not rated (weight redistributed). Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.77 for the level played (National competition 30 · 1st grade 207 · 2nd grade 4 · 3rd grade 10 · Club 20 · 5th grade and below 13). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
No match in the last 2 years, so not ranked. The rating shown is from the career.
Fielding
Keeping: 353 catches + 48 stumpings + 9 run outs (9 direct, 0 assisted) in 284 matches — 1.44 dismissals per match.
Batting
5,689 runs in 275 innings, adjusted average 23.6, strike rate 56.9. Qualifies on the floors (avg ≥ 20, SR ≥ 40).
Bowling
Not rated: 5 wickets from 16.0 overs across 5 matches bowled in (of 284 played) — 0.02 per match, under the 0.25 floor. Bowls too rarely to judge.

Fielding — imported matches (284)

28
Ct (field)
353
Ct (WK)
1.34
Catches / match
9
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
48
Stumpings
438
Total dismissals
1.54
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

5689
Runs (275 inns)
23.55
Avg (adj)
56.91
Strike rate
136
High score
38
Not outs
4
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

5
Wickets (16 ov)
4.69
Economy
15
Average
1
Maidens
0
Extras / over
19.2
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 284 imported
Batting 5689 runs in 275 inns @ 23.55 (SR 56.91)
Milestones 3×100, 30×50, HS 136, 31 ducks
Bowling 5 wkts @ 15 (econ 4.69, SR 19.2)
Best / 5WI 3-30 · 0 five-fors
Fielding 381 ct, 9 RO, 48 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 438 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

1.34
Catches / match
1.54
Dismissals / match

Across 284 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2022/23 3 0 1 1 0.33 11.11 0 0
2021/22 21 4 349 61 19.78 49.36 2 0
2020/21 22 0 445 68 20.23 48.58 2 0
2019/20 21 1 547 84 27.29 68.03 4 0
2018/19 29 7 736 100 31.51 54.6 3 1
2017/18 24 2 783 136* 35.34 59.77 3 2
2016/17 26 2 537 63* 22.24 68.76 3 0
2015/16 34 4 558 70* 18.34 53.14 1 0
2014/15 25 6 504 87 25 60 3 0
2013/14 21 3 495 89 26.94 76.63 4 0
2012/13 18 4 269 53 18.27 65.29 1 0
2011/12 7 1 49 16 8 96.08 0 0
2010/11 16 4 266 51 20.78 475 2 0
2009/10 5 0 132 68 26.4 — 2 0
2008/09 3 0 18 10 6 — 0 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2011/12 1 0 8 0 — 8 —
2009/10 1 0 9 0 — 9 —
2008/09 14 1 58 5 11.6 4.14 16.8

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2022/23 1 1 0 3 5
2021/22 0 28 1 7 36
2020/21 0 35 0 5 40
2019/20 0 28 0 2 30
2018/19 0 31 0 5 36
2017/18 3 21 1 2 27
2016/17 0 38 2 0 40
2015/16 12 31 5 8 56
2014/15 0 49 0 3 52
2013/14 0 37 0 4 41
2012/13 1 28 0 2 31
2011/12 3 14 0 3 20
2010/11 4 7 0 4 15
2009/10 0 4 0 0 4
2008/09 4 1 0 0 5
Pathway benchmark

How does Tom compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Compare with Konstas →

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.