Scott Fagerlund (32)
Representative pathway — 6 pathway points in the overall rating
- ● Premier or state pathway — 8 matches (+3.2)
- ● Regional representative — 10 matches (+1.5)
- ● Body of work — 64 imported matches (+1.3)
Critical recommendations
47 of 59 dismissals caught. Review shot selection — particularly lofted drives and pulls early in the innings. Train hitting along the ground until set.
Out for 0 in 16% of imported innings. Build a repeatable start routine: watch the ball out of the hand, score first run with low-risk pushes.
Only 14% of 50+ scores become hundreds (6 fifties, 1 hundreds). Practise batting in long blocks and resetting targets at 50.
Strengths
- Overall
- Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 26 × 40% · Batting not rated (weight redistributed) · Bowling not rated (weight redistributed). Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
- Level
- ×0.42 for the level played (Rep Div 1 3 · 2nd grade 8 · 3rd grade 7 · Club 43 · 4th grade 3). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
- Form
- No match in the last 2 years, so not ranked. The rating shown is from the career.
- Fielding
- Outfield: 15 catches + 2 run outs (0 direct, 2 assisted) in 64 matches — 0.27 per match.
- Batting
- Not rated: 63 innings at 21.2 average — below the 20 floor needed to be presented as a batter.
- Bowling
- Not rated: 1 wicket from 11.0 overs across 4 matches bowled in (of 64 played) — 0.02 per match, under the 0.25 floor. Bowls too rarely to judge.
Fielding — imported matches (64)
Batting — imported matches
Bowling — imported matches
Dismissal pattern
Imported-match summary
| Matches | 64 imported |
| Batting | 1258 runs in 63 inns @ 21.24 (SR 95.12) |
| Milestones | 1×100, 6×50, HS 189, 10 ducks |
| Bowling | 1 wkts @ 34 (econ 3.09, SR 66) |
| Best / 5WI | 1-15 · 0 five-fors |
| Fielding | 21 ct, 2 RO, 1 st |
Further analysis
Batting form
Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).
Score distribution
How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.
Scoring tempo
Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.
Bowling form
Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.
Wicket accumulation
Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.
Fielding contribution
Breakdown of the 24 dismissals they were involved in.
Per-match fielding rate
Across 64 imported match(es).
Season by season
Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.
Batting
| Season | Inns | NO | Runs | HS | Avg | SR | 50 | 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022/23 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 8 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2021/22 | 8 | 0 | 180 | 68 | 22.5 | 150 | 1 | 0 |
| 2020/21 | 3 | 0 | 27 | 14 | 9 | 180 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019/20 | 6 | 0 | 144 | 61 | 24 | — | 2 | 0 |
| 2018/19 | 2 | 0 | 23 | 23 | 11.5 | 115 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017/18 | 3 | 1 | 235 | 189* | 104.44 | 783.33 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016/17 | 3 | 0 | 21 | 12 | 7 | 233.33 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015/16 | 4 | 0 | 69 | 32 | 17.25 | 75.82 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014/15 | 7 | 1 | 82 | 25* | 13.39 | 73.87 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013/14 | 5 | 0 | 120 | 54 | 24 | 162.16 | 1 | 0 |
| 2012/13 | 4 | 0 | 111 | 55 | 27.75 | — | 1 | 0 |
| 2011/12 | 12 | 0 | 178 | 60 | 14.83 | 254.29 | 1 | 0 |
| 2010/11 | 3 | 1 | 28 | 19 | 12.44 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2009/10 | 2 | 1 | 32 | 30* | 24 | — | 0 | 0 |
Bowling
| Season | Overs | Mdns | Runs | Wkts | Avg | Econ | SR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019/20 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 0 | — | 11 | — |
| 2017/18 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 0 | — | 3.5 | — |
| 2015/16 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| 2011/12 | 7 | 3 | 15 | 1 | 15 | 2.14 | 42 |
Fielding
| Season | Ct | WK Ct | RO | St | Dismissals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022/23 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| 2019/20 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018/19 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| 2017/18 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016/17 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 2015/16 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 2014/15 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| 2013/14 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 2012/13 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011/12 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 2010/11 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
How does Scott compare?
Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.