🏅🛡️ Andrew Perrin (36)

Bowling – Opening Bowler VIC Anchor / accumulator
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings 🎥 Video 12
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Likely same player — one-click merge
play.cricket
Andrew Perrin
— · 5 matches · 75% match
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: University of Tasmania Cricket Club · Casey South Melbourne Cricket Club · Berwick Cricket Club · TAS · Nightcliff Cricket Club · Victoria · Dandenong Cricket Club · St Marys Nagle Cricket Club · Fitzroy Doncaster Cricket Club · Prahran Cricket Club · Bairnsdale Cricket Association Inc
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Proficient
37/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Needs Work
24/100
Batting Working on Basics
not rated — working on basics
Bowling Proficient
59/100

Representative pathway — 49 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● State representation (+12)
  • ● First-class, BBL or international — 4 matches (+8.0)
  • ● National championships — 9 matches (+13.5)
  • ● Premier or state pathway — 153 matches (+10.0)
  • ● Body of work — 299 imported matches (+5.0)

Critical recommendations

high Batting
Getting starts but not surviving

Adjusted average of 7.2 over 188 innings. Focus on the first 15 balls: leave/defend percentages, judgement outside off stump.

medium Batting
High duck rate

Out for 0 in 15% of imported innings. Build a repeatable start routine: watch the ball out of the hand, score first run with low-risk pushes.

medium Fielding
Low overall fielding impact

0.24 dismissals per match across 299 matches. Add direct-hit and ground-fielding reps to turn half-chances into run outs.

Strengths

  • ✓ Builds pressure with a tight economy of 3.24.
How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 24 × 40% · Batting not rated (weight redistributed) · Bowling 59 × 30%. Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.52 for the level played (National competition 13 · 1st grade 141 · 2nd grade 12 · Club 133). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
No match in the last 2 years, so not ranked. The rating shown is from the career.
Fielding
Outfield: 61 catches + 9 run outs (9 direct, 0 assisted) in 299 matches — 0.23 per match.
Batting
Not rated: 188 innings at 7.2 average — below the 20 floor needed to be presented as a batter.
Bowling
567 wickets in 286 matches bowled in (of 299 played) — 1.98 per match at 18.1, economy 3.24, strike rate 33.4.

Fielding — imported matches (299)

61
Ct (field)
1
Ct (WK)
0.21
Catches / match
9
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
71
Total dismissals
0.24
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

984
Runs (188 inns)
7.24
Avg (adj)
63.94
Strike rate
34
High score
72
Not outs
10
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

567
Wickets (3161 ov)
3.24
Economy
18.07
Average
615
Maidens
0.1
Extras / over
33.4
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 299 imported
Batting 984 runs in 188 inns @ 7.24 (SR 63.94)
Milestones 0×100, 0×50, HS 34, 29 ducks
Bowling 567 wkts @ 18.07 (econ 3.24, SR 33.4)
Best / 5WI 8-27 · 14 five-fors
Fielding 62 ct, 9 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 71 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

0.21
Catches / match
0.24
Dismissals / match

Across 299 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2023/24 9 2 64 16* 8.69 58.72 0 0
2022/23 6 3 19 6 4.75 190 0 0
2021/22 6 4 29 8* 8.06 241.67 0 0
2020/21 2 1 8 8 6 100 0 0
2019/20 10 5 47 12* 7.05 71.21 0 0
2018/19 6 3 2 2* 0.5 22.22 0 0
2017/18 14 9 81 19* 9.51 58.27 0 0
2016/17 11 3 22 7 2.55 40 0 0
2015/16 10 6 52 24 8.32 59.09 0 0
2014/15 7 2 35 15 6.43 46.05 0 0
2013/14 14 5 55 17 5.33 239.13 0 0
2012/13 18 5 105 26 7.45 187.5 0 0
2011/12 7 3 45 19* 9.18 112.5 0 0
2010/11 14 4 90 26 8.27 81.08 0 0
2009/10 15 3 86 19 6.88 4300 0 0
2008/09 14 5 125 34 12.12 4166.67 0 0
2007/08 7 2 72 34 13.22 — 0 0
2006/07 9 4 19 8 3.05 — 0 0
2005/06 9 3 28 15 4.15 — 0 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2023/24 82.8 22 207 22 9.41 2.5 22.6
2022/23 93.3 14 399 17 23.47 4.28 32.9
2021/22 76.8 5 255 13 19.62 3.32 35.5
2020/21 114.5 10 443 22 20.14 3.87 31.2
2019/20 168.2 26 575 32 17.97 3.42 31.5
2018/19 83.5 10 397 10 39.7 4.75 50.1
2017/18 261.7 55 898 50 17.96 3.43 31.4
2016/17 320.7 66 995 41 24.27 3.1 46.9
2015/16 206.5 36 649 51 12.73 3.14 24.3
2014/15 191 34 679 34 19.97 3.55 33.7
2013/14 191.2 41 634 26 24.38 3.32 44.1
2012/13 206.7 34 812 41 19.8 3.93 30.2
2011/12 162 38 495 34 14.56 3.06 28.6
2010/11 172 22 651 23 28.3 3.78 44.9
2009/10 177.2 53 408 31 13.16 2.3 34.3
2008/09 185 39 573 34 16.85 3.1 32.6
2007/08 191.8 48 422 33 12.79 2.2 34.9
2006/07 178.7 43 457 36 12.69 2.56 29.8
2005/06 97.5 19 298 17 17.53 3.06 34.4

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2023/24 3 0 0 0 3
2022/23 3 0 1 0 4
2021/22 1 0 0 0 1
2020/21 8 0 1 0 9
2019/20 1 0 0 0 1
2017/18 9 0 0 0 9
2016/17 3 0 0 0 3
2015/16 3 0 0 0 3
2014/15 3 0 2 0 5
2013/14 10 0 1 0 11
2012/13 4 0 1 0 5
2011/12 7 0 1 0 8
2010/11 1 0 1 0 2
2008/09 0 0 1 0 1
2007/08 2 0 0 0 2
2006/07 2 1 0 0 3
2005/06 1 0 0 0 1
Pathway benchmark

How does Andrew compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Compare with Konstas →

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.