Nathan Yates
Ball-by-ball detail isn't available for this match, so the innings worm and shot breakdown aren't shown.
Representative pathway — 3 pathway points in the overall rating
- ● Regional representative — 10 matches (+1.5)
- ● Body of work — 62 imported matches (+1.2)
Critical recommendations
Imported-match numbers are solid across the board. Keep importing matches to track trends over time.
Strengths
- ✓ Consistent run-scorer — adjusted average 35.1.
- ✓ Proven ability to go big — 4 hundred(s), best of 133.
- ✓ Genuine wicket-taker — bowling average of 17.9.
- ✓ Builds pressure with a tight economy of 2.82.
- Overall
- Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 11 × 40% · Batting 50 × 30% · Bowling 54 × 30%. Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
- Level
- ×0.33 for the level played (Rep Div 1 6 · Rep Div 2 4 · Club 52). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
- Form
- No match in the last 2 years, so not ranked. The rating shown is from the career.
- Fielding
- Outfield: 13 catches + 3 run outs (3 direct, 0 assisted) in 62 matches — 0.26 per match.
- Batting
- 1,884 runs in 60 innings, adjusted average 35.1, strike rate 73.2. Qualifies on the floors (avg ≥ 20, SR ≥ 40).
- Bowling
- 76 wickets in 47 matches bowled in (of 62 played) — 1.62 per match at 17.9, economy 2.82, strike rate 38.1.
Fielding — imported matches (62)
Batting — imported matches
Bowling — imported matches
Dismissal pattern
Imported-match summary
| Matches | 62 imported |
| Batting | 1884 runs in 60 inns @ 35.06 (SR 73.15) |
| Milestones | 4×100, 9×50, HS 133, 5 ducks |
| Bowling | 76 wkts @ 17.89 (econ 2.82, SR 38.1) |
| Best / 5WI | 6-19 · 3 five-fors |
| Fielding | 13 ct, 3 RO, 0 st |
Further analysis
Batting form
Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).
Score distribution
How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.
Scoring tempo
Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.
Bowling form
Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.
Wicket accumulation
Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.
Fielding contribution
Breakdown of the 16 dismissals they were involved in.
Per-match fielding rate
Across 62 imported match(es).
Season by season
Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.
Batting
| Season | Inns | NO | Runs | HS | Avg | SR | 50 | 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022/23 | 4 | 0 | 20 | 13 | 5 | 40 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021/22 | 4 | 0 | 68 | 40 | 17 | 101.49 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020/21 | 2 | 0 | 62 | 62 | 31 | 6200 | 1 | 0 |
| 2019/20 | 10 | 3 | 380 | 102* | 49.4 | 79 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018/19 | 5 | 0 | 222 | 72 | 44.4 | 79.57 | 2 | 0 |
| 2017/18 | 5 | 0 | 189 | 70 | 37.8 | 59.81 | 2 | 0 |
| 2016/17 | 6 | 2 | 131 | 50 | 29.11 | 68.23 | 1 | 0 |
| 2015/16 | 8 | 1 | 459 | 133 | 64.55 | 141.23 | 2 | 2 |
| 2013/14 | 5 | 0 | 117 | 34 | 23.4 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2012/13 | 7 | 1 | 190 | 69* | 31.02 | — | 1 | 0 |
| 2011/12 | 3 | 0 | 40 | 29 | 13.33 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2009/10 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 |
Bowling
| Season | Overs | Mdns | Runs | Wkts | Avg | Econ | SR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022/23 | 22 | 6 | 51 | 2 | 25.5 | 2.32 | 66 |
| 2021/22 | 17 | 3 | 73 | 4 | 18.25 | 4.29 | 25.5 |
| 2019/20 | 33 | 3 | 137 | 6 | 22.83 | 4.15 | 33 |
| 2018/19 | 61 | 17 | 170 | 16 | 10.63 | 2.79 | 22.9 |
| 2017/18 | 45 | 15 | 109 | 8 | 13.63 | 2.42 | 33.8 |
| 2016/17 | 54.3 | 13 | 164 | 6 | 27.33 | 3.02 | 54.3 |
| 2015/16 | 68.3 | 25 | 186 | 14 | 13.29 | 2.72 | 29.3 |
| 2013/14 | 49 | 22 | 88 | 7 | 12.57 | 1.8 | 42 |
| 2012/13 | 64 | 17 | 231 | 8 | 28.88 | 3.61 | 48 |
| 2011/12 | 41 | 15 | 98 | 4 | 24.5 | 2.39 | 61.5 |
| 2009/10 | 28 | 11 | 53 | 1 | 53 | 1.89 | 168 |
Fielding
| Season | Ct | WK Ct | RO | St | Dismissals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019/20 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| 2017/18 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| 2015/16 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| 2013/14 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012/13 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011/12 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
How does Nathan compare?
Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.