Josh Bailey

All-Rounder – Genuine ACT Aggressor
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Likely same player — one-click merge
play.cricket
Josh Bailey
— · 16 matches · 25% match
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: Canberra City Cricket Club
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Needs Work
8/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Proficient
40/100
Batting Advance
71/100
Bowling
Not enough data

Representative pathway — 0 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Body of work — 4 imported matches (+0.1)

Critical recommendations

medium Batting
Too many aerial dismissals

3 of 4 dismissals caught. Review shot selection — particularly lofted drives and pulls early in the innings. Train hitting along the ground until set.

info General
Small sample size

Only 4 batting innings imported — import more of this player's matches before treating these findings as conclusive.

info General
Bowling currently the stronger suit

Bowling average (31.2) beats batting average (28.0) — selection case is as a bowling all-rounder; protect bowling workload first.

Strengths

  • ✓ Scores quickly (SR 178.3) without sacrificing consistency.
How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 40 × 40% · Batting 71 × 30% · Bowling not rated (weight redistributed). Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.30 for the level played (Club 4). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
No match in the last 2 years, so not ranked. The rating shown is from the career.
Fielding
Outfield: 1 catches + 0 run outs (0 direct, 0 assisted) in 4 matches — 0.25 per match.
Batting
112 runs in 4 innings, adjusted average 28.0, strike rate 178.3. Qualifies on the floors (avg ≥ 20, SR ≥ 40).
Bowling
Not rated: 4 wickets from 24.0 overs across 4 matches — 1.00 per match, under the 0.25 floor. Bowls too rarely to judge.

Fielding — imported matches (4)

1
Ct (field)
0
Ct (WK)
0.25
Catches / match
0
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
1
Total dismissals
0.25
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

112
Runs (4 inns)
28
Avg (adj)
178.26
Strike rate
41
High score
0
Not outs
6
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

4
Wickets (24 ov)
5.21
Economy
31.25
Average
1
Maidens
0
Extras / over
36
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 4 imported
Batting 112 runs in 4 inns @ 28 (SR 178.26)
Milestones 0×100, 0×50, HS 41, 0 ducks
Bowling 4 wkts @ 31.25 (econ 5.21, SR 36)
Best / 5WI 2-26 · 0 five-fors
Fielding 1 ct, 0 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 1 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

0.25
Catches / match
0.25
Dismissals / match

Across 4 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2010/11 1 0 41 41 41 178.26 0 0
2009/10 2 0 67 35 33.5 — 0 0
2007/08 1 0 4 4 4 — 0 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2010/11 2 0 19 0 — 9.5 —
2009/10 13 1 48 2 24 3.69 39
2007/08 9 0 58 2 29 6.44 27

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2009/10 1 0 0 0 1
Pathway benchmark

How does Josh compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.