🏅 Emily Mifsud (31)

★ Div 1 Rep All-Rounder – Bowling U16 (2010/11) NSW Balanced scorer
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings 🎥 Video 48
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: Gundaroo Goats Cricket Club · Sydney University Cricket Club · Kingborough District Cricket Club · TAS · NSW · New Town Cricket Club · Universities Women's Cricket Club · Bankstown District Cricket Association · City NSW · St George-Sutherland Womens Cricket Club · Combined High Schools · Cricket Tasmania State Competitions · Hobart Hurricanes - TAS
Age: Born on/after 1 Sep 1994 (inferred from U16 eligibility, 2010/11 season)
Green Shield: 0 season(s) played · last GS year 2010/11 (ages out of U16 after this)
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
🏏 Century highlight
100* off 64
Premier League Womens 1st Grade · 2019/20 · 15×4, 0×6 · SR 156

Ball-by-ball detail isn't available for this match, so the innings worm and shot breakdown aren't shown.

Overall Needs Work
32/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Advance
61/100
Batting Proficient
46/100
Bowling Strong
~34/100
discounted — banded on wickets per match

Representative pathway — 22 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● State representation (+12)
  • ● Division 1 representative (+4)
  • ● Premier or state pathway — 1 match (+0.4)
  • ● Regional representative — 3 matches (+0.4)
  • ● Body of work — 277 imported matches (+5.0)

Critical recommendations

medium Batting
High duck rate

Out for 0 in 11% of imported innings. Build a repeatable start routine: watch the ball out of the hand, score first run with low-risk pushes.

medium Batting
Not converting fifties into hundreds

Only 7% of 50+ scores become hundreds (14 fifties, 1 hundreds). Practise batting in long blocks and resetting targets at 50.

Strengths

  • ✓ Proven ability to go big — 1 hundred(s), best of 100.
  • ✓ Dangerous ground fielder — involved in 23 run outs.
How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 61 × 40% · Batting 46 × 30% · Bowling 34 × 30%. Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.53 for the level played (1st grade 1 · 3rd grade 3). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
Rated on the last 4 matches since 26 Oct 2024. Older cricket still shows in the career figures but does not count.
Fielding
Outfield: 69 catches + 23 run outs (22 direct, 1 assisted) in 277 matches — 0.33 per match.
Batting
3,073 runs in 207 innings, adjusted average 17.6, strike rate 80.1. Qualifies on the floors (avg ≥ 20, SR ≥ 40).
Bowling
284 wickets in 228 matches bowled in (of 277 played) — 1.25 per match at 17.8, economy 4.50, strike rate 23.7.

Fielding — imported matches (277)

69
Ct (field)
18
Ct (WK)
0.31
Catches / match
22
RO (direct)
1
RO (assist)
4
Stumpings
114
Total dismissals
0.41
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

3073
Runs (207 inns)
17.57
Avg (adj)
80.07
Strike rate
100
High score
38
Not outs
4
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

284
Wickets (1122.3 ov)
4.5
Economy
17.78
Average
75
Maidens
0.22
Extras / over
23.7
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 277 imported
Batting 3073 runs in 207 inns @ 17.57 (SR 80.07)
Milestones 1×100, 14×50, HS 100, 23 ducks
Bowling 284 wkts @ 17.78 (econ 4.5, SR 23.7)
Best / 5WI 6-28 · 2 five-fors
Fielding 87 ct, 23 RO, 4 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 114 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

0.31
Catches / match
0.41
Dismissals / match

Across 277 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2025/26 2 0 37 29 18.5 97.37 0 0
2024/25 2 1 24 19* 18 58.54 0 0
2023/24 11 4 190 75 23.55 69.6 1 0
2022/23 1 0 24 24 24 150 0 0
2021/22 22 1 445 81 21.15 74.79 4 0
2020/21 25 3 373 64 16.71 77.87 1 0
2019/20 26 7 630 100* 30.75 98.9 2 1
2018/19 27 4 628 71 26.71 101.95 5 0
2017/18 17 2 145 19 9.53 65.91 0 0
2016/17 16 1 125 38* 8.3 833.33 0 0
2015/16 9 3 64 31 9.48 120.75 0 0
2014/15 10 3 116 60* 15.08 116 1 0
2013/14 7 1 53 25 8.65 63.86 0 0
2012/13 11 3 79 21 9.14 72.48 0 0
2011/12 8 3 26 10 4.47 113.04 0 0
2010/11 13 2 114 20* 10.12 438.46 0 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2025/26 13 1 39 2 19.5 3 39
2024/25 7 0 22 0 — 3.14 —
2023/24 34.7 1 219 6 36.5 6.32 34.7
2022/23 16 0 83 2 41.5 5.19 48
2021/22 113.5 3 556 26 21.38 4.9 26.2
2020/21 132.5 14 571 30 19.03 4.31 26.5
2019/20 85 10 336 22 15.27 3.95 23.2
2018/19 123.8 7 599 36 16.64 4.84 20.6
2017/18 153.8 11 626 37 16.92 4.07 24.9
2016/17 90 1 471 26 18.12 5.23 20.8
2015/16 83.5 4 327 26 12.58 3.92 19.3
2014/15 91.7 3 405 27 15 4.42 20.4
2013/14 59 2 318 15 21.2 5.39 23.6
2012/13 76.8 8 341 23 14.83 4.44 20
2011/12 2 0 16 0 — 8 —
2010/11 40 10 121 6 20.17 3.03 40

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2025/26 3 0 0 0 3
2024/25 1 0 0 0 1
2023/24 3 1 1 0 5
2022/23 2 0 0 0 2
2021/22 2 0 1 0 3
2020/21 14 0 4 0 18
2019/20 6 0 1 0 7
2018/19 12 0 3 0 15
2017/18 7 0 0 0 7
2016/17 3 0 1 0 4
2015/16 5 0 2 0 7
2014/15 5 0 4 0 9
2013/14 1 0 1 0 2
2012/13 4 2 3 0 9
2011/12 0 9 0 4 13
2010/11 1 6 2 0 9
Pathway benchmark

How does Emily compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Compare with Konstas →

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.