Riley Stephenson (28)

★ Div 1 Rep Bowling – Opening Bowler U14 (2011/12) WA
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: North Beach Carine Junior Cricket Club · Scarborough Cricket Club
Age: Born on/after 1 Sep 1997 (inferred from U14 eligibility, 2011/12 season)
Green Shield: 0 season(s) played · last GS year 2013/14 (ages out of U16 after this)
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Needs Work
15/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Needs Work
20/100
Batting Working on Basics
not rated — working on basics
Bowling Part Time
~23/100
discounted — banded on wickets per match

Representative pathway — 6 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Division 1 representative (+4)
  • ● Premier or state pathway — 4 matches (+1.6)
  • ● Regional representative — 3 matches (+0.4)
  • ● Body of work — 7 imported matches (+0.1)

Critical recommendations

medium Bowling
Tight but not threatening

Economy of 3.44 is excellent but a wicket every 51 balls is slow. Develop a genuine wicket-taking variation and attack the stumps more.

info General
Small sample size

Only 2 batting innings imported — import more of this player's matches before treating these findings as conclusive.

Strengths

How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 20 × 40% · Batting not rated (weight redistributed) · Bowling 23 × 30%. Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.80 for the level played (1st grade 3 · Rep Div 1 4). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
No match in the last 2 years, so not ranked. The rating shown is from the career.
Fielding
Outfield: 2 catches + 0 run outs (0 direct, 0 assisted) in 7 matches — 0.29 per match.
Batting
Not rated: 2 innings at 0.8 average — below the 20 floor needed to be presented as a batter.
Bowling
4 wickets in 7 matches — 0.57 per match at 29.3, economy 3.44, strike rate 51.0.

Fielding — imported matches (7)

2
Ct (field)
0
Ct (WK)
0.29
Catches / match
0
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
2
Total dismissals
0.29
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

1
Runs (2 inns)
0.75
Avg (adj)
—
Strike rate
1
High score
1
Not outs
9
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

4
Wickets (34 ov)
3.44
Economy
29.25
Average
4
Maidens
0.59
Extras / over
51
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 7 imported
Batting 1 runs in 2 inns @ 0.75 (SR —)
Milestones 0×100, 0×50, HS 1, 1 ducks
Bowling 4 wkts @ 29.25 (econ 3.44, SR 51)
Best / 5WI 3-29 · 0 five-fors
Fielding 2 ct, 0 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 2 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

0.29
Catches / match
0.29
Dismissals / match

Across 7 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2011/12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2010/11 1 1 1 1* 1 100 0 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2012/13 6 1 17 0 — 2.83 —
2011/12 14 2 53 1 53 3.79 84
2010/11 14 1 47 3 15.67 3.36 28

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2011/12 2 0 0 0 2
Pathway benchmark

How does Riley compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.