Rizwan Meghani

Bowling – Opening Bowler NSW
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: Western Suburbs District Cricket Club (NSW Prem) · Hills Barbarians Cricket Club · Hawkesbury Cricket Club (Prem)
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Needs Work
7/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Proficient
41/100
Batting Working on Basics
not rated — working on basics
Bowling Strong
~24/100
discounted — banded on wickets per match

Representative pathway — 2 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Regional representative — 11 matches (+1.6)
  • ● Body of work — 21 imported matches (+0.4)

Critical recommendations

medium Bowling
Tight but not threatening

Economy of 2.83 is excellent but a wicket every 73 balls is slow. Develop a genuine wicket-taking variation and attack the stumps more.

info Fielding
Fielding is a selection weapon

0.48 catches per match is elite for this level — keep it visible by taking the hardest catching positions in big games.

Strengths

  • ✓ Safe hands — 10 catches in 21 matches (0.48 per match), a genuine selection asset.
How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 41 × 40% · Batting not rated (weight redistributed) · Bowling 24 × 30%. Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.27 for the level played (Club 10 · 4th grade 2 · 5th grade and below 9). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
No match in the last 2 years, so not ranked. The rating shown is from the career.
Fielding
Outfield: 10 catches + 0 run outs (0 direct, 0 assisted) in 21 matches — 0.48 per match.
Batting
Not rated: 16 innings at 17.6 average — below the 20 floor needed to be presented as a batter.
Bowling
12 wickets in 16 matches bowled in (of 21 played) — 0.75 per match at 34.6, economy 2.83, strike rate 73.3.

Fielding — imported matches (21)

10
Ct (field)
0
Ct (WK)
0.48
Catches / match
0
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
10
Total dismissals
0.48
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

225
Runs (16 inns)
17.58
Avg (adj)
—
Strike rate
51
High score
4
Not outs
9
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

12
Wickets (146.5 ov)
2.83
Economy
34.58
Average
31
Maidens
0.03
Extras / over
73.3
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 21 imported
Batting 225 runs in 16 inns @ 17.58 (SR —)
Milestones 0×100, 1×50, HS 51, 0 ducks
Bowling 12 wkts @ 34.58 (econ 2.83, SR 73.3)
Best / 5WI 3-47 · 0 five-fors
Fielding 10 ct, 0 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 10 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

0.48
Catches / match
0.48
Dismissals / match

Across 21 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2016/17 1 0 9 9 9 — 0 0
2010/11 6 4 35 13* 9.72 — 0 0
2009/10 9 0 181 51 20.11 — 1 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2010/11 69.7 11 199 4 49.75 2.86 104.5
2009/10 76.8 20 216 8 27 2.81 57.6

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2010/11 2 0 0 0 2
2009/10 8 0 0 0 8
Pathway benchmark

How does Rizwan compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.