Todd Howlett

Bowling – Opening Bowler TAS
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: Richmond Cambridge Cricket Club
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Needs Work
0/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Needs Work
0/100
Batting Working on Basics
not rated — working on basics
Bowling Strong
~31/100
discounted — banded on wickets per match

Representative pathway — 0 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Body of work — 12 imported matches (+0.2)

Critical recommendations

high Batting
Getting starts but not surviving

Adjusted average of 10.5 over 8 innings. Focus on the first 15 balls: leave/defend percentages, judgement outside off stump.

medium Batting
High duck rate

Out for 0 in 12% of imported innings. Build a repeatable start routine: watch the ball out of the hand, score first run with low-risk pushes.

medium Bowling
Tight but not threatening

Economy of 3.07 is excellent but a wicket every 66 balls is slow. Develop a genuine wicket-taking variation and attack the stumps more.

Strengths

How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 0 × 40% · Batting not rated (weight redistributed) · Bowling 31 × 30%. Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.30 for the level played (Club 12). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
No match in the last 2 years, so not ranked. The rating shown is from the career.
Fielding
Outfield: 3 catches + 0 run outs (0 direct, 0 assisted) in 12 matches — 0.25 per match.
Batting
Not rated: 8 innings at 10.5 average — below the 20 floor needed to be presented as a batter.
Bowling
11 wickets in 11 matches bowled in (of 12 played) — 1.00 per match at 33.5, economy 3.07, strike rate 65.5.

Fielding — imported matches (12)

3
Ct (field)
0
Ct (WK)
0.25
Catches / match
0
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
3
Total dismissals
0.25
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

61
Runs (8 inns)
10.48
Avg (adj)
—
Strike rate
26
High score
3
Not outs
9
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

11
Wickets (120 ov)
3.07
Economy
33.45
Average
19
Maidens
0.15
Extras / over
65.5
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 12 imported
Batting 61 runs in 8 inns @ 10.48 (SR —)
Milestones 0×100, 0×50, HS 26, 1 ducks
Bowling 11 wkts @ 33.45 (econ 3.07, SR 65.5)
Best / 5WI 3-31 · 0 five-fors
Fielding 3 ct, 0 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 3 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

0.25
Catches / match
0.25
Dismissals / match

Across 12 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2000/01 1 0 3 3 3 — 0 0
1994/95 2 1 19 10 14.25 — 0 0
1993/94 3 0 3 2 1 — 0 0
1992/93 2 2 36 26* 18 — 0 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2009/10 10 0 51 0 — 5.1 —
2000/01 18 2 73 2 36.5 4.06 54
1994/95 21 3 49 3 16.33 2.33 42
1993/94 66 12 187 5 37.4 2.83 79.2
1992/93 5 2 8 1 8 1.6 30

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2000/01 1 0 0 0 1
1993/94 1 0 0 0 1
1992/93 1 0 0 0 1
Pathway benchmark

How does Todd compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.