Travis Faulkhead

All-Rounder – Bowling VIC
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: Geelong Cricket Club
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Needs Work
23/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Advance
58/100
Batting Proficient
38/100
Bowling Working on Basics
not rated — working on basics

Representative pathway — 11 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Premier or state pathway — 28 matches (+10.0)
  • ● Body of work — 28 imported matches (+0.6)

Critical recommendations

medium Batting
High duck rate

Out for 0 in 17% of imported innings. Build a repeatable start routine: watch the ball out of the hand, score first run with low-risk pushes.

info Fielding
Fielding is a selection weapon

0.82 catches per match is elite for this level — keep it visible by taking the hardest catching positions in big games.

Strengths

  • ✓ Proven ability to go big — 1 hundred(s), best of 118.
  • ✓ Safe hands — 23 catches in 28 matches (0.82 per match), a genuine selection asset.
How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 58 × 40% · Batting 38 × 30% · Bowling not rated (weight redistributed). Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.61 for the level played (1st grade 2 · 2nd grade 26). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
No match in the last 2 years, so not ranked. The rating shown is from the career.
Fielding
Outfield: 23 catches + 0 run outs (0 direct, 0 assisted) in 28 matches — 0.82 per match.
Batting
722 runs in 29 innings, adjusted average 26.6. Qualifies on the floors (avg ≥ 20, SR ≥ 40).
Bowling
Not rated: 4 wickets from 122.8 overs across 19 matches bowled in (of 28 played) — 0.21 per match, under the 0.25 floor. Bowls too rarely to judge.

Fielding — imported matches (28)

23
Ct (field)
0
Ct (WK)
0.82
Catches / match
0
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
23
Total dismissals
0.82
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

722
Runs (29 inns)
26.61
Avg (adj)
—
Strike rate
118
High score
2
Not outs
3
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

4
Wickets (122.8 ov)
3.35
Economy
103
Average
20
Maidens
0.04
Extras / over
184.3
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 28 imported
Batting 722 runs in 29 inns @ 26.61 (SR —)
Milestones 1×100, 2×50, HS 118, 5 ducks
Bowling 4 wkts @ 103 (econ 3.35, SR 184.3)
Best / 5WI 1-8 · 0 five-fors
Fielding 23 ct, 0 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 23 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

0.82
Catches / match
0.82
Dismissals / match

Across 28 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2005/06 5 0 79 33 15.8 877.78 0 0
2003/04 10 0 199 64 19.9 — 1 0
2002/03 14 2 444 118 36.24 — 1 1

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2005/06 16 0 75 0 — 4.69 —
2003/04 56.8 15 135 3 45 2.38 113.7
2002/03 50 5 202 1 202 4.04 300

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2005/06 3 0 0 0 3
2003/04 5 0 0 0 5
2002/03 15 0 0 0 15
Pathway benchmark

How does Travis compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.