Nathan Gadd

All-Rounder – Bowling TAS
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Likely same player — one-click merge
play.cricket
Nathan Gadd
TAS · 100 matches · 25% match
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: DOSA Cricket Club
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Needs Work
7/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Needs Work
15/100
Batting Proficient
41/100
Bowling Proficient
51/100

Representative pathway — 1 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Body of work — 27 imported matches (+0.5)

Critical recommendations

medium Batting
Not converting fifties into hundreds

Only 0% of 50+ scores become hundreds (5 fifties, 0 hundreds). Practise batting in long blocks and resetting targets at 50.

medium Fielding
Low overall fielding impact

0.22 dismissals per match across 27 matches. Add direct-hit and ground-fielding reps to turn half-chances into run outs.

Strengths

How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 15 × 40% · Batting 41 × 30% · Bowling 51 × 30%. Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.30 for the level played (Club 27). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
No match in the last 2 years, so not ranked. The rating shown is from the career.
Fielding
Outfield: 5 catches + 1 run outs (1 direct, 0 assisted) in 27 matches — 0.22 per match.
Batting
586 runs in 24 innings, adjusted average 27.5. Qualifies on the floors (avg ≥ 20, SR ≥ 40).
Bowling
21 wickets in 21 matches bowled in (of 27 played) — 1.00 per match at 24.9, economy 4.15, strike rate 36.0.

Fielding — imported matches (27)

5
Ct (field)
0
Ct (WK)
0.19
Catches / match
1
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
6
Total dismissals
0.22
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

586
Runs (24 inns)
27.47
Avg (adj)
—
Strike rate
76
High score
3
Not outs
2
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

21
Wickets (126 ov)
4.15
Economy
24.9
Average
15
Maidens
0.45
Extras / over
36
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 27 imported
Batting 586 runs in 24 inns @ 27.47 (SR —)
Milestones 0×100, 5×50, HS 76, 1 ducks
Bowling 21 wkts @ 24.9 (econ 4.15, SR 36)
Best / 5WI 3-33 · 0 five-fors
Fielding 5 ct, 1 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 6 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

0.19
Catches / match
0.22
Dismissals / match

Across 27 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2014/15 5 1 101 54* 24.24 — 1 0
2013/14 4 0 69 38 17.25 — 0 0
2012/13 2 0 20 20 10 — 0 0
2011/12 2 0 91 60 45.5 — 1 0
2010/11 2 1 93 66* 69.75 — 1 0
2009/10 5 1 159 76* 38.16 — 2 0
2008/09 4 0 53 21 13.25 — 0 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2014/15 12 0 34 1 34 2.83 72
2013/14 29 5 109 4 27.25 3.76 43.5
2012/13 33 6 115 8 14.38 3.48 24.8
2011/12 7 0 43 1 43 6.14 42
2010/11 5 1 35 1 35 7 30
2009/10 18 1 94 1 94 5.22 108
2008/09 22 2 93 5 18.6 4.23 26.4

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2014/15 1 0 0 0 1
2013/14 2 0 0 0 2
2011/12 1 0 1 0 2
2010/11 1 0 0 0 1
Pathway benchmark

How does Nathan compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.