Tyler O’Neill

Batting – Top-Order Batter VIC
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings 🎥 Video 2
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: Coburg Cricket Club · Glenroy Cricket Club · Geelong Cricket Club · Bell Post Hill Cricket Club · Pascoe Vale Hadfield Cricket Club · Newcomb & District Cricket Club · Strathmore Heights Cricket Club
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Needs Work
0/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Needs Work
0/100
Batting
Not enough data
Bowling
Not enough data

Representative pathway — 0 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Body of work — 24 imported matches (+0.5)

Critical recommendations

medium Bowling
Tight but not threatening

Economy of 3.37 is excellent but a wicket every 41 balls is slow. Develop a genuine wicket-taking variation and attack the stumps more.

Strengths

  • ✓ Safe hands — 9 catches in 24 matches (0.38 per match), a genuine selection asset.
How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 0 × 40% · Batting not rated (weight redistributed) · Bowling not rated (weight redistributed). Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.30 for the level played (Club 1). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
Rated on the last 1 match since 27 Oct 2024. Older cricket still shows in the career figures but does not count.
Fielding
Outfield: 7 catches + 0 run outs (0 direct, 0 assisted) in 24 matches — 0.29 per match.
Batting
Not rated: 21 innings at 23.7 average — below the 20 floor needed to be presented as a batter.
Bowling
Not rated: 9 wickets from 62.0 overs across 8 matches bowled in (of 24 played) — 0.38 per match, under the 0.25 floor. Bowls too rarely to judge.

Fielding — imported matches (24)

7
Ct (field)
2
Ct (WK)
0.38
Catches / match
0
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
1
Stumpings
10
Total dismissals
0.42
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

436
Runs (21 inns)
23.73
Avg (adj)
66.98
Strike rate
88
High score
3
Not outs
3
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

9
Wickets (62 ov)
3.37
Economy
23.22
Average
15
Maidens
0.05
Extras / over
41.3
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 24 imported
Batting 436 runs in 21 inns @ 23.73 (SR 66.98)
Milestones 0×100, 1×50, HS 88, 0 ducks
Bowling 9 wkts @ 23.22 (econ 3.37, SR 41.3)
Best / 5WI 3-24 · 0 five-fors
Fielding 9 ct, 0 RO, 1 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 10 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

0.38
Catches / match
0.42
Dismissals / match

Across 24 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2023/24 2 0 31 17 15.5 68.89 0 0
2022/23 2 0 44 39 22 — 0 0
2021/22 6 1 114 31 22.17 70.37 0 0
2020/21 6 0 185 88 30.83 85.25 1 0
2017/18 1 0 4 4 4 — 0 0
2016/17 2 0 54 32 27 — 0 0
2014/15 2 2 4 3* 2 — 0 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2023/24 19 8 33 3 11 1.74 38
2022/23 7 0 44 1 44 6.29 42
2020/21 6 0 30 1 30 5 36
2018/19 2 0 9 0 — 4.5 —
2017/18 5 0 31 0 — 6.2 —
2016/17 23 7 62 4 15.5 2.7 34.5

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2023/24 1 0 0 0 1
2022/23 2 0 0 0 2
2021/22 2 0 0 1 3
2020/21 1 2 0 0 3
2016/17 1 0 0 0 1
Pathway benchmark

How does Tyler compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.