🏅 Ben Laughlin (44)

★ Div 1 Rep Bowling – First-Change Bowler QLD Aggressor
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings 🎥 Video 33
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: University of Tasmania Cricket Club · Brisbane Heat · Tewantin-Noosa Cricket Club · Sunshine Coast Scorchers · Queensland Cricket Masters · TAS · Adelaide Strikers · Wynnum Manly District Cricket Club · Hobart Hurricanes - TAS
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
🏏 Century highlight
157 off 162
Division 1 · 2022/23 · 20×4, 5×6 · SR 97

Ball-by-ball detail isn't available for this match, so the innings worm and shot breakdown aren't shown.

Overall Needs Work
15/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Needs Work
8/100
Batting Proficient
60/100
Bowling Strong
~31/100
discounted — banded on wickets per match

Representative pathway — 21 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● State representation (+12)
  • ● Division 1 representative (+4)
  • ● Regional representative — 3 matches (+0.4)
  • ● Body of work — 279 imported matches (+5.0)

Critical recommendations

medium Batting
High duck rate

Out for 0 in 10% of imported innings. Build a repeatable start routine: watch the ball out of the hand, score first run with low-risk pushes.

medium Batting
Not converting fifties into hundreds

Only 7% of 50+ scores become hundreds (14 fifties, 1 hundreds). Practise batting in long blocks and resetting targets at 50.

Strengths

  • ✓ Proven ability to go big — 1 hundred(s), best of 157.
  • ✓ Dangerous ground fielder — involved in 12 run outs.
How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 8 × 40% · Batting 60 × 30% · Bowling 31 × 30%. Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.35 for the level played (1st grade 1 · Club 10). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
Rated on the last 11 matches since 31 Oct 2024. Older cricket still shows in the career figures but does not count.
Fielding
Outfield: 91 catches + 12 run outs (12 direct, 0 assisted) in 279 matches — 0.37 per match.
Batting
2,892 runs in 185 innings, adjusted average 19.2, strike rate 81.5. Qualifies on the floors (avg ≥ 20, SR ≥ 40).
Bowling
480 wickets in 253 matches bowled in (of 279 played) — 1.90 per match at 17.6, economy 3.67, strike rate 28.7.

Fielding — imported matches (279)

91
Ct (field)
0
Ct (WK)
0.33
Catches / match
12
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
103
Total dismissals
0.37
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

2892
Runs (185 inns)
19.18
Avg (adj)
81.52
Strike rate
157
High score
42
Not outs
8
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

480
Wickets (2298.8 ov)
3.67
Economy
17.58
Average
503
Maidens
0.08
Extras / over
28.7
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 279 imported
Batting 2892 runs in 185 inns @ 19.18 (SR 81.52)
Milestones 1×100, 14×50, HS 157, 19 ducks
Bowling 480 wkts @ 17.58 (econ 3.67, SR 28.7)
Best / 5WI 8-21 · 17 five-fors
Fielding 91 ct, 12 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 103 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

0.33
Catches / match
0.37
Dismissals / match

Across 279 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2025/26 8 0 190 52 23.75 155.74 1 0
2024/25 2 1 51 51* 38.25 364.29 1 0
2023/24 19 1 496 89 27.48 128.5 4 0
2022/23 18 0 643 157 35.72 135.08 5 1
2021/22 6 3 126 50 31.5 132.63 1 0
2020/21 3 3 8 6* 2.67 72.73 0 0
2019/20 7 4 40 17 8.98 102.56 0 0
2018/19 4 1 16 14 5 80 0 0
2017/18 1 0 1 1 1 33.33 0 0
2016/17 3 1 0 0* 0 0 0 0
2015/16 2 1 7 6 5.25 233.33 0 0
2014/15 4 1 50 22 15.63 277.78 0 0
2013/14 19 1 234 56 12.96 95.51 1 0
2012/13 21 5 236 31 13.91 92.55 0 0
2011/12 9 2 131 50 17.79 80.86 1 0
2010/11 8 1 93 47 13.08 — 0 0
2009/10 8 2 80 25* 12.5 — 0 0
2008/09 12 4 130 45 14.44 — 0 0
2007/08 11 5 182 34* 24.07 39.65 0 0
2006/07 11 4 64 18 7.93 26.45 0 0
2005/06 9 2 114 48 15.48 43.18 0 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2025/26 23 2 81 4 20.25 3.52 34.5
2024/25 7 0 43 0 — 6.14 —
2023/24 110.5 23 327 35 9.34 2.96 18.9
2022/23 125.2 43 319 29 11 2.55 25.9
2021/22 83.8 16 218 27 8.07 2.6 18.6
2020/21 38 0 330 3 110 8.68 76
2019/20 47.3 0 401 16 25.06 8.47 17.8
2018/19 51.5 0 428 12 35.67 8.31 25.8
2017/18 44 0 368 16 23 8.36 16.5
2016/17 22 0 134 9 14.89 6.09 14.7
2015/16 30 0 242 12 20.17 8.07 15
2014/15 36.7 3 277 14 19.79 7.55 15.7
2013/14 134.2 13 694 30 23.13 5.17 26.8
2012/13 224.5 29 865 52 16.63 3.85 25.9
2011/12 157.8 36 469 47 9.98 2.97 20.1
2010/11 212.8 43 745 39 19.1 3.5 32.7
2009/10 125.8 34 353 11 32.09 2.81 68.6
2008/09 206.7 53 623 33 18.88 3.01 37.6
2007/08 221 62 673 25 26.92 3.05 53
2006/07 238 82 560 38 14.74 2.35 37.6
2005/06 159 64 290 28 10.36 1.82 34.1

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2025/26 1 0 0 0 1
2023/24 7 0 0 0 7
2022/23 10 0 1 0 11
2021/22 5 0 1 0 6
2020/21 5 0 0 0 5
2019/20 9 0 0 0 9
2018/19 6 0 1 0 7
2017/18 4 0 0 0 4
2016/17 3 0 0 0 3
2015/16 2 0 0 0 2
2014/15 2 0 3 0 5
2013/14 8 0 2 0 10
2012/13 7 0 1 0 8
2011/12 7 0 2 0 9
2010/11 7 0 0 0 7
2009/10 1 0 0 0 1
2008/09 7 0 1 0 8
Pathway benchmark

How does Ben compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Compare with Konstas →

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.