Stuart Nell

Batting – Top-Order Batter WA Balanced scorer
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Likely same player — one-click merge
play.cricket
Stuart Nell
WA · 2 matches · 25% match
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: Melville Cricket Club · Murdoch University Melville Cricket Club · Curtin Victoria Park Cricket Club · University Cricket Club · Murdoch Tigers Cricket Club · Murdoch University Reds Cricket Club
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Needs Work
7/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Needs Work
21/100
Batting Working on Basics
not rated — working on basics
Bowling Working on Basics
not rated — working on basics

Representative pathway — 2 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Regional representative — 9 matches (+1.3)
  • ● Body of work — 21 imported matches (+0.4)

Critical recommendations

info General
No critical flags

Imported-match numbers are solid across the board. Keep importing matches to track trends over time.

Strengths

How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 21 × 40% · Batting not rated (weight redistributed) · Bowling not rated (weight redistributed). Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.30 for the level played (3rd grade 2 · Club 12 · 4th grade 7). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
No match in the last 2 years, so not ranked. The rating shown is from the career.
Fielding
Outfield: 6 catches + 0 run outs (0 direct, 0 assisted) in 21 matches — 0.29 per match.
Batting
Not rated: 21 innings at 21.5 average — below the 20 floor needed to be presented as a batter.
Bowling
Not rated: 2 wickets from 36.0 overs across 5 matches bowled in (of 21 played) — 0.10 per match, under the 0.25 floor. Bowls too rarely to judge.

Fielding — imported matches (21)

6
Ct (field)
0
Ct (WK)
0.29
Catches / match
0
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
6
Total dismissals
0.29
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

379
Runs (21 inns)
21.49
Avg (adj)
101.79
Strike rate
77
High score
4
Not outs
4
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

2
Wickets (36 ov)
5.06
Economy
91
Average
2
Maidens
0
Extras / over
108
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 21 imported
Batting 379 runs in 21 inns @ 21.49 (SR 101.79)
Milestones 0×100, 2×50, HS 77, 2 ducks
Bowling 2 wkts @ 91 (econ 5.06, SR 108)
Best / 5WI 1-10 · 0 five-fors
Fielding 6 ct, 0 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 6 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

0.29
Catches / match
0.29
Dismissals / match

Across 21 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2013/14 1 0 4 4 4 — 0 0
2012/13 9 1 179 59* 22.1 — 1 0
2011/12 7 1 175 77* 28.57 156.25 1 0
2010/11 3 2 21 10* 11.67 — 0 0
2008/09 1 0 0 0 0 — 0 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2011/12 2 0 10 1 10 5 12
2010/11 29 2 150 1 150 5.17 174
2008/09 5 0 22 0 — 4.4 —

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2012/13 1 0 0 0 1
2011/12 4 0 0 0 4
2010/11 1 0 0 0 1
Pathway benchmark

How does Stuart compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.