Thomas Cornock

Bowling – Second-Change Bowler
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: Kenthurst Upper Hills Cricket Club
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Needs Work
7/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Needs Work
24/100
Batting Working on Basics
not rated — working on basics
Bowling Proficient
61/100

Representative pathway — 0 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Body of work — 20 imported matches (+0.4)

Critical recommendations

high Batting
Getting starts but not surviving

Adjusted average of 11.5 over 16 innings. Focus on the first 15 balls: leave/defend percentages, judgement outside off stump.

high Batting
Vulnerable to the straight ball

9 of 14 dismissals are bowled/LBW — likely playing across the front pad or leaving a gate. Work on a straighter bat path and head position over the ball.

medium Batting
High duck rate

Out for 0 in 19% of imported innings. Build a repeatable start routine: watch the ball out of the hand, score first run with low-risk pushes.

Strengths

  • ✓ Safe hands — 7 catches in 20 matches (0.35 per match), a genuine selection asset.
How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 24 × 40% · Batting not rated (weight redistributed) · Bowling 61 × 30%. Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.30 for the level played (Club 20). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
No match in the last 2 years, so not ranked. The rating shown is from the career.
Fielding
Outfield: 7 catches + 0 run outs (0 direct, 0 assisted) in 20 matches — 0.35 per match.
Batting
Not rated: 16 innings at 11.5 average — below the 20 floor needed to be presented as a batter.
Bowling
12 wickets in 16 matches bowled in (of 20 played) — 0.75 per match at 18.3, economy 3.84, strike rate 28.5.

Fielding — imported matches (20)

7
Ct (field)
0
Ct (WK)
0.35
Catches / match
0
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
7
Total dismissals
0.35
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

164
Runs (16 inns)
11.53
Avg (adj)
—
Strike rate
43
High score
2
Not outs
8
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

12
Wickets (57 ov)
3.84
Economy
18.25
Average
5
Maidens
0.21
Extras / over
28.5
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 20 imported
Batting 164 runs in 16 inns @ 11.53 (SR —)
Milestones 0×100, 0×50, HS 43, 3 ducks
Bowling 12 wkts @ 18.25 (econ 3.84, SR 28.5)
Best / 5WI 3-5 · 0 five-fors
Fielding 7 ct, 0 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 7 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

0.35
Catches / match
0.35
Dismissals / match

Across 20 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2011/12 7 0 19 10 2.71 — 0 0
2010/11 4 1 72 35* 22.5 — 0 0
2009/10 5 1 73 43 17.52 — 0 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2011/12 29 2 96 7 13.71 3.31 24.9
2010/11 14 2 46 3 15.33 3.29 28
2009/10 14 1 77 2 38.5 5.5 42

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2011/12 3 0 0 0 3
2009/10 4 0 0 0 4
Pathway benchmark

How does Thomas compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.