Phil Jones

Bowling – Second-Change Bowler TAS
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Likely same player — one-click merge
play.cricket
Phil Jones
TAS · 2 matches · 75% match
play.cricket
Phil Jones
TAS · 6 matches · 50% match
play.cricket
Phil Jones
— · 1 matches · 25% match
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: Oaklands Cricket Club · West Ridgley Cricket Club
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Needs Work
10/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Proficient
49/100
Batting Working on Basics
not rated — working on basics
Bowling Proficient
49/100

Representative pathway — 0 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Body of work — 24 imported matches (+0.5)

Critical recommendations

high Batting
Getting starts but not surviving

Adjusted average of 9.5 over 15 innings. Focus on the first 15 balls: leave/defend percentages, judgement outside off stump.

medium Batting
High duck rate

Out for 0 in 20% of imported innings. Build a repeatable start routine: watch the ball out of the hand, score first run with low-risk pushes.

Strengths

  • ✓ Safe hands — 9 catches in 24 matches (0.38 per match), a genuine selection asset.
How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 49 × 40% · Batting not rated (weight redistributed) · Bowling 49 × 30%. Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.30 for the level played (Club 24). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
No match in the last 2 years, so not ranked. The rating shown is from the career.
Fielding
Outfield: 9 catches + 0 run outs (0 direct, 0 assisted) in 24 matches — 0.38 per match.
Batting
Not rated: 15 innings at 9.5 average — below the 20 floor needed to be presented as a batter.
Bowling
10 wickets in 10 matches bowled in (of 24 played) — 1.00 per match at 22.5, economy 4.22, strike rate 32.0.

Fielding — imported matches (24)

9
Ct (field)
0
Ct (WK)
0.38
Catches / match
0
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
9
Total dismissals
0.38
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

134
Runs (15 inns)
9.53
Avg (adj)
—
Strike rate
49
High score
1
Not outs
6
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

10
Wickets (53.3 ov)
4.22
Economy
22.5
Average
7
Maidens
0.02
Extras / over
32
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 24 imported
Batting 134 runs in 15 inns @ 9.53 (SR —)
Milestones 0×100, 0×50, HS 49, 3 ducks
Bowling 10 wkts @ 22.5 (econ 4.22, SR 32)
Best / 5WI 3-16 · 0 five-fors
Fielding 9 ct, 0 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 9 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

0.38
Catches / match
0.38
Dismissals / match

Across 24 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2020/21 1 0 7 7 7 — 0 0
2017/18 7 0 105 49 15 — 0 0
2016/17 7 1 22 7 3.59 — 0 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2017/18 39.7 5 171 5 34.2 4.31 47.6
2016/17 13.7 2 54 5 10.8 3.95 16.4

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2020/21 2 0 0 0 2
2017/18 5 0 0 0 5
2016/17 2 0 0 0 2
Pathway benchmark

How does Phil compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.