Mark Tonks

Batting – Opening Batter NSW Anchor / accumulator
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Likely same player — one-click merge
play.cricket
Mark Tonks
NSW · 1 matches · 100% match
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: Berridale Cricket Club · Bega-Angledale Cricket Club · Monaro District Cricket Association · Bombala Cricket Club
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Needs Work
0/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Needs Work
0/100
Batting Proficient
39/100
Bowling
Not enough data

Representative pathway — 0 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Body of work — 20 imported matches (+0.4)

Critical recommendations

high Bowling
Economy under pressure

Going at 8.29 an over. Tighten the stock ball: hit a consistent length, cut out the 4-ball (short and wide / overpitched on the pads).

high Fielding
Catching return too low for selection

Only 0.00 catches per match over 20 matches. Fielding is the first thing selectors compare when batting/bowling are close — make catching the priority: 30 high balls + 30 flat catches per session, and ask to field in the ring/slips where chances come.

medium Batting
High duck rate

Out for 0 in 10% of imported innings. Build a repeatable start routine: watch the ball out of the hand, score first run with low-risk pushes.

Strengths

How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 0 × 40% · Batting 39 × 30% · Bowling not rated (weight redistributed). Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.30 for the level played (Club 5). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
Rated on the last 5 matches since 26 Oct 2024. Older cricket still shows in the career figures but does not count.
Fielding
Outfield: 0 catches + 0 run outs (0 direct, 0 assisted) in 20 matches — 0.00 per match.
Batting
269 runs in 19 innings, adjusted average 15.7, strike rate 70.5. Qualifies on the floors (avg ≥ 20, SR ≥ 40).
Bowling
Not rated: 7 wickets from 7.0 overs across 3 matches bowled in (of 20 played) — 0.35 per match, under the 0.25 floor. Bowls too rarely to judge.

Fielding — imported matches (20)

0
Ct (field)
0
Ct (WK)
0
Catches / match
0
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
0
Total dismissals
0
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

269
Runs (19 inns)
15.65
Avg (adj)
70.51
Strike rate
62
High score
2
Not outs
2
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

7
Wickets (7 ov)
8.29
Economy
8.29
Average
0
Maidens
0.14
Extras / over
6
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 20 imported
Batting 269 runs in 19 inns @ 15.65 (SR 70.51)
Milestones 0×100, 1×50, HS 62, 2 ducks
Bowling 7 wkts @ 8.29 (econ 8.29, SR 6)
Best / 5WI 5-4 · 1 five-fors
Fielding 0 ct, 0 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2025/26 4 1 50 25 15.63 67.57 0 0
2023/24 3 0 78 62 26 216.67 1 0
2022/23 12 1 141 37* 12.73 3525 0 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2025/26 3 0 43 0 — 14.33 —
2023/24 2 0 11 2 5.5 5.5 6
2022/23 2 0 4 5 0.8 2 2.4
Pathway benchmark

How does Mark compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.