Mark Brady

Bowling – First-Change Bowler NSW
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Likely same player — one-click merge
play.cricket
Mark Brady
NSW · 9 matches · 75% match
play.cricket
Mark Brady
NSW · 3 matches · 75% match
play.cricket
Mark Brady
— · 3 matches · 25% match
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: University of Newcastle Cricket Club · General Roberts Hotel Cricket Club
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Needs Work
0/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Needs Work
0/100
Batting Working on Basics
not rated — working on basics
Bowling
Not enough data

Representative pathway — 0 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Body of work — 11 imported matches (+0.2)

Critical recommendations

high Batting
Vulnerable to the straight ball

3 of 6 dismissals are bowled/LBW — likely playing across the front pad or leaving a gate. Work on a straighter bat path and head position over the ball.

Strengths

How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 0 × 40% · Batting not rated (weight redistributed) · Bowling not rated (weight redistributed). Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.30 for the level played (Club 11). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
No match in the last 2 years, so not ranked. The rating shown is from the career.
Fielding
Outfield: 3 catches + 0 run outs (0 direct, 0 assisted) in 11 matches — 0.27 per match.
Batting
Not rated: 9 innings at 33.0 average — below the 20 floor needed to be presented as a batter.
Bowling
Not rated: 13 wickets from 56.2 overs across 9 matches bowled in (of 11 played) — 1.44 per match, under the 0.25 floor. Bowls too rarely to judge.

Fielding — imported matches (11)

3
Ct (field)
0
Ct (WK)
0.27
Catches / match
0
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
3
Total dismissals
0.27
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

223
Runs (9 inns)
33.04
Avg (adj)
—
Strike rate
64
High score
3
Not outs
6
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

13
Wickets (56.2 ov)
3.31
Economy
14.31
Average
8
Maidens
0.34
Extras / over
25.9
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 11 imported
Batting 223 runs in 9 inns @ 33.04 (SR —)
Milestones 0×100, 1×50, HS 64, 0 ducks
Bowling 13 wkts @ 14.31 (econ 3.31, SR 25.9)
Best / 5WI 3-24 · 0 five-fors
Fielding 3 ct, 0 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 3 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

0.27
Catches / match
0.27
Dismissals / match

Across 11 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2017/18 1 0 2 2 2 — 0 0
2016/17 1 0 37 37 37 — 0 0
2014/15 1 1 64 64* 64 — 1 0
2012/13 1 1 23 23* 23 — 0 0
2009/10 3 1 54 28 24 — 0 0
2007/08 2 0 43 36 21.5 — 0 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2019/20 4 0 15 2 7.5 3.75 12
2017/18 4 0 30 1 30 7.5 24
2016/17 23.2 5 61 4 15.25 2.63 34.8
2014/15 7 0 24 3 8 3.43 14
2009/10 11 2 33 2 16.5 3 33
2007/08 7 1 23 1 23 3.29 42

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2016/17 1 0 0 0 1
2012/13 2 0 0 0 2
Pathway benchmark

How does Mark compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.