Soren Tinberg (30)

Bowling – First-Change Bowler U11 (2006/07)
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: Peninsula Junior Cricket Club
Age: Born on/after 1 Sep 1995 (inferred from U11 eligibility, 2006/07 season)
Green Shield: 0 season(s) played · last GS year 2011/12 (ages out of U16 after this)
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Needs Work
0/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Needs Work
0/100
Batting Working on Basics
not rated — working on basics
Bowling Part Time
~23/100
discounted — banded on wickets per match

Representative pathway — 0 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Body of work — 9 imported matches (+0.2)

Critical recommendations

high Batting
Getting starts but not surviving

Adjusted average of 6.0 over 8 innings. Focus on the first 15 balls: leave/defend percentages, judgement outside off stump.

medium Batting
Too many aerial dismissals

5 of 7 dismissals caught. Review shot selection — particularly lofted drives and pulls early in the innings. Train hitting along the ground until set.

medium Batting
High duck rate

Out for 0 in 12% of imported innings. Build a repeatable start routine: watch the ball out of the hand, score first run with low-risk pushes.

medium Bowling
Tight but not threatening

Economy of 1.39 is excellent but a wicket every 82 balls is slow. Develop a genuine wicket-taking variation and attack the stumps more.

Strengths

How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 0 × 40% · Batting not rated (weight redistributed) · Bowling 23 × 30%. Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.30 for the level played (Club 9). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
No match in the last 2 years, so not ranked. The rating shown is from the career.
Fielding
Outfield: 0 catches + 0 run outs (0 direct, 0 assisted) in 9 matches — 0.00 per match.
Batting
Not rated: 8 innings at 6.1 average — below the 20 floor needed to be presented as a batter.
Bowling
3 wickets in 8 matches bowled in (of 9 played) — 0.38 per match at 19.0, economy 1.39, strike rate 82.0.

Fielding — imported matches (9)

0
Ct (field)
0
Ct (WK)
0
Catches / match
0
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
0
Total dismissals
0
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

43
Runs (8 inns)
6.05
Avg (adj)
—
Strike rate
16
High score
1
Not outs
6
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

3
Wickets (41 ov)
1.39
Economy
19
Average
15
Maidens
0
Extras / over
82
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 9 imported
Batting 43 runs in 8 inns @ 6.05 (SR —)
Milestones 0×100, 0×50, HS 16, 1 ducks
Bowling 3 wkts @ 19 (econ 1.39, SR 82)
Best / 5WI 1-3 · 0 five-fors
Fielding 0 ct, 0 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2008/09 2 0 3 3 1.5 — 0 0
2007/08 2 0 11 9 5.5 — 0 0
2006/07 4 1 29 16 9.06 — 0 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2008/09 14 6 20 1 20 1.43 84
2007/08 10 4 14 0 — 1.4 —
2006/07 17 5 23 2 11.5 1.35 51
Pathway benchmark

How does Soren compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.