Oscar Hanisch

Batting – Lower-Order Batter VIC
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Likely same player — one-click merge
play.cricket
Oscar Hanisch
VIC · 13 matches · 50% match
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: Old Melbourne Grammar Cricket Club
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Needs Work
4/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Needs Work
10/100
Batting Working on Basics
not rated — working on basics
Bowling Strong
~22/100
discounted — banded on wickets per match

Representative pathway — 0 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Body of work — 11 imported matches (+0.2)

Critical recommendations

high Bowling
Conceding too many extras

1.3 wides/no-balls per over is gifting runs and momentum. Groove the run-up and release with target bowling — a cone on a 4th-stump line, 30+ balls per session.

high Bowling
Economy under pressure

Going at 6.00 an over. Tighten the stock ball: hit a consistent length, cut out the 4-ball (short and wide / overpitched on the pads).

high Fielding
Catching return too low for selection

Only 0.09 catches per match over 11 matches. Fielding is the first thing selectors compare when batting/bowling are close — make catching the priority: 30 high balls + 30 flat catches per session, and ask to field in the ring/slips where chances come.

info General
Small sample size

Only 1 batting innings imported — import more of this player's matches before treating these findings as conclusive.

Strengths

How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 10 × 40% · Batting not rated (weight redistributed) · Bowling 22 × 30%. Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.30 for the level played (Club 8). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
Rated on the last 8 matches since 27 Oct 2024. Older cricket still shows in the career figures but does not count.
Fielding
Outfield: 1 catches + 0 run outs (0 direct, 0 assisted) in 11 matches — 0.09 per match.
Batting
Not rated: 1 innings at 2.0 average — below the 20 floor needed to be presented as a batter.
Bowling
5 wickets in 10 matches bowled in (of 11 played) — 0.50 per match at 45.6, economy 6.00, strike rate 45.6.

Fielding — imported matches (11)

1
Ct (field)
0
Ct (WK)
0.09
Catches / match
0
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
1
Total dismissals
0.09
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

2
Runs (1 inns)
2
Avg (adj)
—
Strike rate
2
High score
1
Not outs
11
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

5
Wickets (38 ov)
6
Economy
45.6
Average
2
Maidens
1.34
Extras / over
45.6
Strike rate

Imported-match summary

Matches 11 imported
Batting 2 runs in 1 inns @ 2 (SR —)
Milestones 0×100, 0×50, HS 2, 0 ducks
Bowling 5 wkts @ 45.6 (econ 6, SR 45.6)
Best / 5WI 4-42 · 0 five-fors
Fielding 1 ct, 0 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 1 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

0.09
Catches / match
0.09
Dismissals / match

Across 11 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2024/25 1 1 2 2* 2 100 0 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2025/26 28 2 163 4 40.75 5.82 42
2024/25 6 0 44 1 44 7.33 36
2023/24 4 0 21 0 — 5.25 —

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2024/25 1 0 0 0 1
Pathway benchmark

How does Oscar compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.