Nathan Skewes

Fielding – Wicketkeeper-Batter SA
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: Para Districts Cricket Association · Eyre Royals Cricket Club · Penfield Cricket Club
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Needs Work
5/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Needs Work
10/100
Batting Proficient
44/100
Bowling
Not enough data

Representative pathway — 1 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Body of work — 37 imported matches (+0.7)

Critical recommendations

medium Fielding
Keeping dismissal rate below par

0.27 keeping dismissals (WK catches + stumpings) per match. Work standing-up takes and leg-side stumpings — the fastest way for a keeper to add value.

info Fielding
Fielding is a selection weapon

0.49 catches per match is elite for this level — keep it visible by taking the hardest catching positions in big games.

Strengths

  • ✓ Safe hands — 18 catches in 37 matches (0.49 per match), a genuine selection asset.
How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 10 × 40% · Batting 44 × 30% · Bowling not rated (weight redistributed). Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.30 for the level played (Club 37). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
No match in the last 2 years, so not ranked. The rating shown is from the career.
Fielding
Outfield: 8 catches + 0 run outs (0 direct, 0 assisted) in 37 matches — 0.22 per match.
Batting
600 runs in 36 innings, adjusted average 18.1. Qualifies on the floors (avg ≥ 20, SR ≥ 40).
Bowling
Not rated: 7 wickets from 30.0 overs across 8 matches bowled in (of 37 played) — 0.19 per match, under the 0.25 floor. Bowls too rarely to judge.

Fielding — imported matches (37)

8
Ct (field)
10
Ct (WK)
0.49
Catches / match
0
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
18
Total dismissals
0.49
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

600
Runs (36 inns)
18.06
Avg (adj)
—
Strike rate
69
High score
3
Not outs
1
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

7
Wickets (30 ov)
4.67
Economy
20
Average
2
Maidens
0
Extras / over
25.7
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 37 imported
Batting 600 runs in 36 inns @ 18.06 (SR —)
Milestones 0×100, 3×50, HS 69, 2 ducks
Bowling 7 wkts @ 20 (econ 4.67, SR 25.7)
Best / 5WI 2-4 · 0 five-fors
Fielding 18 ct, 0 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 18 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

0.49
Catches / match
0.49
Dismissals / match

Across 37 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2013/14 8 2 206 60* 32.19 — 2 0
2012/13 9 1 162 69* 20 — 1 0
2011/12 3 0 34 24 11.33 — 0 0
2010/11 9 0 86 40 9.56 — 0 0
2009/10 7 0 112 39 16 — 0 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2013/14 3 0 9 1 9 3 18
2012/13 5 0 22 1 22 4.4 30
2010/11 17 0 105 3 35 6.18 34
2009/10 5 2 4 2 2 0.8 15

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2013/14 0 4 0 0 4
2012/13 2 4 0 0 6
2011/12 2 0 0 0 2
2010/11 4 2 0 0 6
Pathway benchmark

How does Nathan compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.