Scotch Adelaide vs Carey Grammar Invitational · 2024/25 · 4×4, 0×6
· SR 77
The story is the acceleration: a measured first fifty off 74 balls (SR 68), then 50 to 100 in just 64 (SR 78) — more than double the tempo.
Scoring breakdown
16 of 108 runs (15%) in boundaries · 55% dots
Runs vs balls faced
0→20 · 29 balls · SR 69watchful
20→40 · 29 balls · SR 69watchful
40→50 · 16 balls · SR 63watchful
50→60 · 11 balls · SR 91steady
60→80 · 20 balls · SR 100steady
80→100 · 33 balls · SR 61watchful
OverallNeeds Work
28/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
FieldingAdvance
73/100
BattingWorking on Basics
not rated — working on basics
Bowling
Not enough data
Representative pathway — 25 pathway points in the overall rating
● State representation (+12)
● Division 1 representative (+4)
● Premier or state pathway — 15 matches (+6.0)
● Body of work — 144 imported matches (+2.9)
Critical recommendations
infoFielding
Fielding is a selection weapon
0.73 catches per match is elite for this level — keep it visible by taking the hardest catching positions in big games.
Strengths
✓ Safe hands — 105 catches in 144 matches (0.73 per match), a genuine selection asset.
✓ Dangerous ground fielder — involved in 35 run outs.
✓ Sharp glovework — 35 stumpings.
How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 73 × 40% · Batting not rated (weight redistributed) · Bowling not rated (weight redistributed). Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.46 for the level played (State competition 9 · Rep Div 1 6 · Club 39). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
Rated on the last 54 matches since 28 Oct 2024. Older cricket still shows in the career figures but does not count.
Fielding
Keeping: 80 catches + 35 stumpings + 35 run outs (7 direct, 28 assisted) in 144 matches — 1.04 dismissals per match.
Batting
Not rated: 113 innings at 16.4 average — below the 20 floor needed to be presented as a batter.
Bowling
Not rated: 2 wickets from 7.0 overs across 4 matches bowled in (of 144 played) — 0.01 per match, under the 0.25 floor. Bowls too rarely to judge.
Fielding — imported matches (144)
25
Ct (field)
80
Ct (WK)
0.73
Catches / match
7
RO (direct)
28
RO (assist)
35
Stumpings
175
Total dismissals
1.22
Dismissals / match
Batting — imported matches
1508
Runs (113 inns)
16.42
Avg (adj)
73.52
Strike rate
108
High score
26
Not outs
5
Median position
Century (100+)Fifty (50–99)Not out (under 50)Out (under 50)
Bowling — imported matches
2
Wickets (7 ov)
3.86
Economy
13.5
Average
0
Maidens
0.14
Extras / over
21
Strike rate
Dismissal pattern
Imported-match summary
Matches
144 imported
Batting
1508 runs in 113 inns @ 16.42 (SR 73.52)
Milestones
1×100, 2×50, HS 108, 8 ducks
Bowling
2 wkts @ 13.5 (econ 3.86, SR 21)
Best / 5WI
1-1 · 0 five-fors
Fielding
105 ct, 35 RO, 35 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.
Further analysis
Batting form
Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).
Score distribution
How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.
Scoring tempo
Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.
Bowling form
Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.
Wicket accumulation
Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.
Fielding contribution
Breakdown of the 175 dismissals they were involved in.
Per-match fielding rate
0.73
Catches / match
1.22
Dismissals / match
Across 144 imported match(es).
Season by season
Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.
Batting
Season
Inns
NO
Runs
HS
Avg
SR
50
100
2026/27
6
0
73
30
12.17
59.84
0
0
2025/26
38
10
510
58*
16.95
90.11
1
0
2024/25
42
9
742
108*
21.45
85.39
1
1
2023/24
18
4
136
24
9.23
65.38
0
0
2022/23
9
3
47
22*
6.96
50.54
0
0
Bowling
Season
Overs
Mdns
Runs
Wkts
Avg
Econ
SR
2025/26
2
0
6
2
3
3
6
2023/24
2
0
14
0
—
7
—
2022/23
3
0
7
0
—
2.33
—
Fielding
Season
Ct
WK Ct
RO
St
Dismissals
2026/27
0
4
0
0
4
2025/26
12
35
10
9
66
2024/25
2
30
13
16
61
2023/24
1
11
8
6
26
2022/23
10
0
4
4
18
Pathway benchmark
How does Frederick compare?
Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.