Abel Scopelliti (25)

Bowling – Second-Change Bowler U15 (2015/16)
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: Muckleford Cricket Club · Castlemaine & District Cricket Association
Age: Born on/after 1 Sep 2000 (inferred from U15 eligibility, 2015/16 season)
Green Shield: 0 season(s) played · last GS year 2016/17 (ages out of U16 after this)
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Needs Work
7/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Needs Work
12/100
Batting Working on Basics
not rated — working on basics
Bowling Elite
77/100

Representative pathway — 1 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Body of work — 27 imported matches (+0.5)

Critical recommendations

high Fielding
Catching return too low for selection

Only 0.11 catches per match over 27 matches. Fielding is the first thing selectors compare when batting/bowling are close — make catching the priority: 30 high balls + 30 flat catches per session, and ask to field in the ring/slips where chances come.

Strengths

  • ✓ Genuine wicket-taker — bowling average of 8.1.
  • ✓ Builds pressure with a tight economy of 2.79.
  • ✓ Strikes regularly — a wicket every 18 balls.
How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 12 × 40% · Batting not rated (weight redistributed) · Bowling 77 × 30%. Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.30 for the level played (Club 27). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
No match in the last 2 years, so not ranked. The rating shown is from the career.
Fielding
Outfield: 3 catches + 0 run outs (0 direct, 0 assisted) in 27 matches — 0.11 per match.
Batting
Not rated: 18 innings at 15.6 average — below the 20 floor needed to be presented as a batter.
Bowling
20 wickets in 16 matches bowled in (of 27 played) — 1.25 per match at 8.1, economy 2.79, strike rate 17.5.

Fielding — imported matches (27)

3
Ct (field)
0
Ct (WK)
0.11
Catches / match
0
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
3
Total dismissals
0.11
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

220
Runs (18 inns)
15.62
Avg (adj)
—
Strike rate
47
High score
5
Not outs
5
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

20
Wickets (58.2 ov)
2.79
Economy
8.1
Average
14
Maidens
0
Extras / over
17.5
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 27 imported
Batting 220 runs in 18 inns @ 15.62 (SR —)
Milestones 0×100, 0×50, HS 47, 1 ducks
Bowling 20 wkts @ 8.1 (econ 2.79, SR 17.5)
Best / 5WI 3-8 · 0 five-fors
Fielding 3 ct, 0 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 3 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

0.11
Catches / match
0.11
Dismissals / match

Across 27 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2015/16 12 3 169 47 17.6 — 0 0
2014/15 6 2 51 13 11.33 — 0 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2015/16 32.2 7 89 14 6.36 2.77 13.8
2014/15 24 7 68 6 11.33 2.83 24
2013/14 2 0 5 0 — 2.5 —

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2015/16 3 0 0 0 3
Pathway benchmark

How does Abel compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.