Scott Nichols (39)

All-Rounder – Genuine U17 (2003/04) TAS Anchor / accumulator
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Likely same player — one-click merge
play.cricket
Scott Nichols
TAS · 122 matches · 50% match
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: Tasmania
Age: Born on/after 1 Sep 1986 (inferred from U17 eligibility, 2003/04 season)
Green Shield: 0 season(s) played · last GS year 2002/03 (ages out of U16 after this)
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Needs Work
32/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Needs Work
0/100
Batting Proficient
59/100
Bowling Proficient
35/100

Representative pathway — 14 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● National championships — 12 matches (+14.0)
  • ● Body of work — 12 imported matches (+0.2)

Critical recommendations

high Batting
Strike rotation needs urgent work

Strike rate of 46.0 means long dot-ball chains and pressure on partners. Drill singles into gaps, soft-hand placement, and calling.

high Fielding
Catching return too low for selection

Only 0.00 catches per match over 12 matches. Fielding is the first thing selectors compare when batting/bowling are close — make catching the priority: 30 high balls + 30 flat catches per session, and ask to field in the ring/slips where chances come.

medium Bowling
Tight but not threatening

Economy of 3.60 is excellent but a wicket every 55 balls is slow. Develop a genuine wicket-taking variation and attack the stumps more.

Strengths

  • ✓ Consistent run-scorer — adjusted average 34.4.
  • ✓ Builds pressure with a tight economy of 3.60.
How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 0 × 40% · Batting 59 × 30% · Bowling 35 × 30%. Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×1.00 for the level played (National competition 12). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
No match in the last 2 years, so not ranked. The rating shown is from the career.
Fielding
Outfield: 0 catches + 0 run outs (0 direct, 0 assisted) in 12 matches — 0.00 per match.
Batting
330 runs in 12 innings, adjusted average 34.4, strike rate 46.0. Qualifies on the floors (avg ≥ 20, SR ≥ 40).
Bowling
14 wickets in 12 matches — 1.17 per match at 32.9, economy 3.60, strike rate 54.7.

Fielding — imported matches (12)

0
Ct (field)
0
Ct (WK)
0
Catches / match
0
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
0
Total dismissals
0
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

330
Runs (12 inns)
34.38
Avg (adj)
45.98
Strike rate
80
High score
3
Not outs
7
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

14
Wickets (127.7 ov)
3.6
Economy
32.86
Average
16
Maidens
0
Extras / over
54.7
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 12 imported
Batting 330 runs in 12 inns @ 34.38 (SR 45.98)
Milestones 0×100, 1×50, HS 80, 1 ducks
Bowling 14 wkts @ 32.86 (econ 3.6, SR 54.7)
Best / 5WI 3-33 · 0 five-fors
Fielding 0 ct, 0 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2004/05 7 1 230 80 37.55 55.02 1 0
2003/04 5 2 100 44* 28 49.02 0 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2004/05 57.7 8 260 8 32.5 4.51 43.3
2003/04 70 8 200 6 33.33 2.86 70
Pathway benchmark

How does Scott compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.