Mark Connelly

Fielding – Wicketkeeper-Batter TAS Anchor / accumulator
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: Latrobe Demons Cricket Club · Sassafras Cricket Club
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Needs Work
6/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Needs Work
32/100
Batting Proficient
45/100
Bowling
Not enough data

Representative pathway — 0 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Body of work — 23 imported matches (+0.5)

Critical recommendations

high Batting
Strike rotation needs urgent work

Strike rate of 51.8 means long dot-ball chains and pressure on partners. Drill singles into gaps, soft-hand placement, and calling.

info Fielding
Fielding is a selection weapon

0.52 catches per match is elite for this level — keep it visible by taking the hardest catching positions in big games.

Strengths

  • ✓ Safe hands — 12 catches in 23 matches (0.52 per match), a genuine selection asset.
How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 32 × 40% · Batting 45 × 30% · Bowling not rated (weight redistributed). Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.30 for the level played (Club 23). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
No match in the last 2 years, so not ranked. The rating shown is from the career.
Fielding
Keeping: 11 catches + 3 stumpings + 0 run outs (0 direct, 0 assisted) in 23 matches — 0.61 dismissals per match.
Batting
434 runs in 22 innings, adjusted average 22.4, strike rate 51.8. Qualifies on the floors (avg ≥ 20, SR ≥ 40).
Bowling
Not rated: 2 wickets from 17.5 overs across 4 matches bowled in (of 23 played) — 0.09 per match, under the 0.25 floor. Bowls too rarely to judge.

Fielding — imported matches (23)

1
Ct (field)
11
Ct (WK)
0.52
Catches / match
0
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
3
Stumpings
15
Total dismissals
0.65
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

434
Runs (22 inns)
22.42
Avg (adj)
51.83
Strike rate
58
High score
3
Not outs
2
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

2
Wickets (17.5 ov)
4.17
Economy
36.5
Average
2
Maidens
0
Extras / over
52.5
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 23 imported
Batting 434 runs in 22 inns @ 22.42 (SR 51.83)
Milestones 0×100, 3×50, HS 58, 2 ducks
Bowling 2 wkts @ 36.5 (econ 4.17, SR 52.5)
Best / 5WI 1-7 · 0 five-fors
Fielding 12 ct, 0 RO, 3 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 15 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

0.52
Catches / match
0.65
Dismissals / match

Across 23 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2023/24 1 1 20 20* 20 95.24 0 0
2022/23 1 1 54 54* 54 47.37 1 0
2020/21 1 1 39 39* 39 46.99 0 0
2019/20 4 0 49 29 12.25 — 0 0
2018/19 13 0 260 58 20 — 2 0
2015/16 2 0 12 9 6 — 0 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2019/20 13.5 1 57 1 57 4.22 81
2018/19 4 1 16 1 16 4 24

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2023/24 0 1 0 0 1
2019/20 1 0 0 0 1
2018/19 0 8 0 3 11
2015/16 0 2 0 0 2
Pathway benchmark

How does Mark compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.