Michael Parbs

All-Rounder – Bowling TAS Balanced scorer
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Likely same player — one-click merge
play.cricket
Michael Parbs
TAS · 5 matches · 100% match
play.cricket
Michael Parbs
TAS · 12 matches · 75% match
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: South Hobart Sandy Bay Cricket Club · Huonville Bulls Cricket Club · North Huon Warriors Cricket Club · Glen Huon
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Needs Work
13/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Proficient
49/100
Batting Proficient
67/100
Bowling Proficient
59/100

Representative pathway — 5 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Premier or state pathway — 1 match (+0.4)
  • ● Body of work — 265 imported matches (+5.0)

Critical recommendations

medium Batting
Not converting fifties into hundreds

Only 14% of 50+ scores become hundreds (43 fifties, 7 hundreds). Practise batting in long blocks and resetting targets at 50.

info Fielding
Fielding is a selection weapon

0.48 catches per match is elite for this level — keep it visible by taking the hardest catching positions in big games.

Strengths

  • ✓ Consistent run-scorer — adjusted average 33.9.
  • ✓ Scores quickly (SR 93.9) without sacrificing consistency.
  • ✓ Proven ability to go big — 7 hundred(s), best of 151.
  • ✓ Genuine wicket-taker — bowling average of 15.6.
  • ✓ Builds pressure with a tight economy of 3.13.
  • ✓ Safe hands — 128 catches in 265 matches (0.48 per match), a genuine selection asset.
  • ✓ Dangerous ground fielder — involved in 14 run outs.
How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 49 × 40% · Batting 67 × 30% · Bowling 59 × 30%. Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.30 for the level played (1st grade 1 · Club 264). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
No match in the last 2 years, so not ranked. The rating shown is from the career.
Fielding
Outfield: 127 catches + 14 run outs (14 direct, 0 assisted) in 265 matches — 0.53 per match.
Batting
7,289 runs in 245 innings, adjusted average 33.9, strike rate 93.9. Qualifies on the floors (avg ≥ 20, SR ≥ 40).
Bowling
391 wickets in 246 matches bowled in (of 265 played) — 1.59 per match at 15.6, economy 3.13, strike rate 29.9.

Fielding — imported matches (265)

127
Ct (field)
1
Ct (WK)
0.48
Catches / match
14
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
142
Total dismissals
0.54
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

7289
Runs (245 inns)
33.88
Avg (adj)
93.94
Strike rate
151
High score
34
Not outs
5
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

391
Wickets (1951.7 ov)
3.13
Economy
15.62
Average
400
Maidens
0.1
Extras / over
29.9
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 265 imported
Batting 7289 runs in 245 inns @ 33.88 (SR 93.94)
Milestones 7×100, 43×50, HS 151, 17 ducks
Bowling 391 wkts @ 15.62 (econ 3.13, SR 29.9)
Best / 5WI 7-20 · 10 five-fors
Fielding 128 ct, 14 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 142 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

0.48
Catches / match
0.54
Dismissals / match

Across 265 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2021/22 10 0 199 53 19.9 121.34 1 0
2020/21 12 0 247 56 20.58 143.6 1 0
2019/20 17 3 561 102 38.82 510 2 1
2018/19 17 4 520 102* 37.79 238.53 2 1
2017/18 9 2 263 86 35.72 302.3 3 0
2016/17 15 2 539 96* 40.72 770 5 0
2015/16 3 1 94 71* 41.78 — 1 0
2014/15 18 5 462 100 32.8 — 2 1
2013/14 18 2 422 80 26.05 — 2 0
2012/13 19 4 647 100* 41.22 — 5 1
2011/12 17 3 397 78 27.47 — 2 0
2010/11 18 3 629 122* 40.77 — 2 2
2009/10 9 0 270 56 30 — 2 0
2008/09 8 1 303 97* 42.61 — 2 0
2007/08 8 0 238 57 29.75 — 1 0
2006/07 15 1 532 151 37.83 — 3 1
2005/06 6 1 193 62 37.53 — 2 0
2004/05 14 1 482 84 36.89 — 3 0
2003/04 10 1 284 97* 31.24 — 2 0
2000/01 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1997/98 1 0 7 7 7 — 0 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2021/22 95.3 23 210 11 19.09 2.2 52
2020/21 92 21 270 12 22.5 2.93 46
2019/20 130.3 37 345 24 14.38 2.65 32.6
2018/19 127 27 413 17 24.29 3.25 44.8
2017/18 62.7 7 272 13 20.92 4.34 28.9
2016/17 121 20 402 26 15.46 3.32 27.9
2015/16 23.3 3 66 6 11 2.83 23.3
2014/15 145.7 31 444 32 13.88 3.05 27.3
2013/14 116.7 24 429 28 15.32 3.68 25
2012/13 146.2 17 575 34 16.91 3.93 25.8
2011/12 152.2 21 573 36 15.92 3.77 25.4
2010/11 117.5 23 381 28 13.61 3.24 25.2
2009/10 84.2 20 222 17 13.06 2.64 29.7
2008/09 50.7 12 155 7 22.14 3.06 43.4
2007/08 59.7 10 180 8 22.5 3.02 44.8
2006/07 132.8 33 364 25 14.56 2.74 31.9
2005/06 57 10 190 8 23.75 3.33 42.8
2004/05 115.3 28 290 30 9.67 2.51 23.1
2003/04 101.2 25 273 29 9.41 2.7 20.9
2000/01 13 3 33 0 — 2.54 —
1997/98 8 5 22 0 — 2.75 —

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2021/22 5 0 1 0 6
2020/21 3 0 0 0 3
2019/20 6 0 2 0 8
2018/19 9 0 0 0 9
2017/18 4 0 1 0 5
2016/17 7 0 4 0 11
2015/16 1 0 0 0 1
2014/15 14 0 2 0 16
2013/14 6 0 2 0 8
2012/13 10 0 2 0 12
2011/12 9 0 0 0 9
2010/11 15 0 0 0 15
2009/10 3 0 0 0 3
2008/09 2 0 0 0 2
2007/08 7 0 0 0 7
2006/07 12 0 0 0 12
2005/06 2 0 0 0 2
2004/05 7 0 0 0 7
2003/04 5 1 0 0 6
Pathway benchmark

How does Michael compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Compare with Konstas →

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.