Jack Suridge (29)

Fielding – Wicketkeeper-Batter U15 (2011/12) TAS Anchor / accumulator
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: South Hobart Sandy Bay Cricket Club
Age: Born on/after 1 Sep 1996 (inferred from U15 eligibility, 2011/12 season)
Green Shield: 0 season(s) played · last GS year 2012/13 (ages out of U16 after this)
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Proficient
46/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Elite
88/100
Batting Working on Basics
not rated — working on basics
Bowling
Not enough data

Representative pathway — 2 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Premier or state pathway — 4 matches (+1.6)
  • ● Body of work — 4 imported matches (+0.1)

Critical recommendations

high Batting
Strike rotation needs urgent work

Strike rate of 26.3 means long dot-ball chains and pressure on partners. Drill singles into gaps, soft-hand placement, and calling.

high Batting
Vulnerable to the straight ball

2 of 4 dismissals are bowled/LBW — likely playing across the front pad or leaving a gate. Work on a straighter bat path and head position over the ball.

info General
Small sample size

Only 4 batting innings imported — import more of this player's matches before treating these findings as conclusive.

Strengths

  • ✓ Safe hands — 6 catches in 4 matches (1.50 per match), a genuine selection asset.
How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 88 × 40% · Batting not rated (weight redistributed) · Bowling not rated (weight redistributed). Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.78 for the level played (Rep Div 1 4). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
No match in the last 2 years, so not ranked. The rating shown is from the career.
Fielding
Keeping: 6 catches + 1 stumpings + 1 run outs (1 direct, 0 assisted) in 4 matches — 2.00 dismissals per match.
Batting
Not rated: 4 innings at 18.0 average — below the 20 floor needed to be presented as a batter.
Bowling
Not rated: 0 wickets from 6.0 overs across 1 matches bowled in (of 4 played) — 0.00 per match, under the 0.25 floor. Bowls too rarely to judge.

Fielding — imported matches (4)

0
Ct (field)
6
Ct (WK)
1.5
Catches / match
1
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
1
Stumpings
8
Total dismissals
2
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

72
Runs (4 inns)
18
Avg (adj)
26.32
Strike rate
67
High score
0
Not outs
6
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

0
Wickets (6 ov)
4.17
Economy
—
Average
0
Maidens
0.5
Extras / over
—
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 4 imported
Batting 72 runs in 4 inns @ 18 (SR 26.32)
Milestones 0×100, 1×50, HS 67, 1 ducks
Bowling 0 wkts @ — (econ 4.17, SR —)
Best / 5WI 0-25 · 0 five-fors
Fielding 6 ct, 1 RO, 1 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 8 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

1.5
Catches / match
2
Dismissals / match

Across 4 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2011/12 3 0 72 67 24 378.95 1 0
2010/11 1 0 0 0 0 — 0 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2011/12 6 0 25 0 — 4.17 —

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2011/12 0 4 0 0 4
2010/11 0 2 1 1 4
Pathway benchmark

How does Jack compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.