Peter Turich

Bowling – Second-Change Bowler QLD Anchor / accumulator
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: Redlands Tigers Cricket · Brothers - Bundaberg Cricket Club · Redlands Cricket Inc (Club)
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Needs Work
2/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Needs Work
0/100
Batting Working on Basics
not rated — working on basics
Bowling
Not enough data

Representative pathway — 4 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Premier or state pathway — 10 matches (+4.0)
  • ● Regional representative — 1 match (+0.1)
  • ● Body of work — 14 imported matches (+0.3)

Critical recommendations

high Batting
Strike rotation needs urgent work

Strike rate of 42.1 means long dot-ball chains and pressure on partners. Drill singles into gaps, soft-hand placement, and calling.

medium Batting
High duck rate

Out for 0 in 10% of imported innings. Build a repeatable start routine: watch the ball out of the hand, score first run with low-risk pushes.

Strengths

How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 0 × 40% · Batting not rated (weight redistributed) · Bowling not rated (weight redistributed). Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.44 for the level played (2nd grade 10 · 3rd grade 1 · Club 3). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
No match in the last 2 years, so not ranked. The rating shown is from the career.
Fielding
Outfield: 1 catches + 0 run outs (0 direct, 0 assisted) in 14 matches — 0.07 per match.
Batting
Not rated: 19 innings at 15.6 average — below the 20 floor needed to be presented as a batter.
Bowling
Not rated: 8 wickets from 40.0 overs across 4 matches bowled in (of 14 played) — 0.57 per match, under the 0.25 floor. Bowls too rarely to judge.

Fielding — imported matches (14)

1
Ct (field)
3
Ct (WK)
0.29
Catches / match
0
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
4
Total dismissals
0.29
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

281
Runs (19 inns)
15.57
Avg (adj)
42.15
Strike rate
42
High score
1
Not outs
5
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

8
Wickets (40 ov)
3.15
Economy
15.75
Average
8
Maidens
0
Extras / over
30
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 14 imported
Batting 281 runs in 19 inns @ 15.57 (SR 42.15)
Milestones 0×100, 0×50, HS 42, 2 ducks
Bowling 8 wkts @ 15.75 (econ 3.15, SR 30)
Best / 5WI 6-51 · 1 five-fors
Fielding 4 ct, 0 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 4 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

0.29
Catches / match
0.29
Dismissals / match

Across 14 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2011/12 1 0 42 42 42 — 0 0
2009/10 3 0 33 16 11 — 0 0
2008/09 4 0 42 25 10.5 — 0 0
2006/07 11 1 164 29 16.26 62.84 0 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2011/12 8 0 40 2 20 5 24
2009/10 4 0 25 0 — 6.25 —
2008/09 25 8 51 6 8.5 2.04 25
2006/07 3 0 10 0 — 3.33 —

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2009/10 1 3 0 0 4
Pathway benchmark

How does Peter compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.