Daniel Wiles

Bowling – First-Change Bowler VIC Anchor / accumulator
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: Lysterfield Cricket Club · Upwey-Tecoma Cricket Club · Endeavour Hills Cricket Club · Mercantile Cricket Association
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Needs Work
6/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Needs Work
28/100
Batting Working on Basics
not rated — working on basics
Bowling Strong
~40/100
discounted — banded on wickets per match

Representative pathway — 0 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Body of work — 16 imported matches (+0.3)

Critical recommendations

high Batting
Getting starts but not surviving

Adjusted average of 8.5 over 13 innings. Focus on the first 15 balls: leave/defend percentages, judgement outside off stump.

high Batting
Vulnerable to the straight ball

6 of 12 dismissals are bowled/LBW — likely playing across the front pad or leaving a gate. Work on a straighter bat path and head position over the ball.

Strengths

How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 28 × 40% · Batting not rated (weight redistributed) · Bowling 40 × 30%. Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.30 for the level played (Club 16). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
No match in the last 2 years, so not ranked. The rating shown is from the career.
Fielding
Outfield: 3 catches + 1 run outs (1 direct, 0 assisted) in 16 matches — 0.25 per match.
Batting
Not rated: 13 innings at 8.5 average — below the 20 floor needed to be presented as a batter.
Bowling
9 wickets in 11 matches bowled in (of 16 played) — 0.82 per match at 34.3, economy 5.19, strike rate 39.7.

Fielding — imported matches (16)

3
Ct (field)
0
Ct (WK)
0.19
Catches / match
1
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
4
Total dismissals
0.25
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

103
Runs (13 inns)
8.53
Avg (adj)
33.93
Strike rate
29
High score
1
Not outs
8
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

9
Wickets (59.5 ov)
5.19
Economy
34.33
Average
4
Maidens
0.08
Extras / over
39.7
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 16 imported
Batting 103 runs in 13 inns @ 8.53 (SR 33.93)
Milestones 0×100, 0×50, HS 29, 1 ducks
Bowling 9 wkts @ 34.33 (econ 5.19, SR 39.7)
Best / 5WI 2-12 · 0 five-fors
Fielding 3 ct, 1 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 4 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

0.19
Catches / match
0.25
Dismissals / match

Across 16 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2017/18 5 1 30 19 7.2 53.57 0 0
2016/17 4 0 55 29 13.75 — 0 0
2015/16 3 0 17 7 5.67 — 0 0
2014/15 1 0 1 1 1 — 0 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2017/18 12.2 1 49 2 24.5 4.03 36.5
2016/17 14.3 0 103 2 51.5 7.19 43
2015/16 23 1 125 3 41.67 5.43 46
2014/15 4 0 20 0 — 5 —
2012/13 6 2 12 2 6 2 18

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2017/18 2 0 0 0 2
2016/17 0 0 1 0 1
2014/15 1 0 0 0 1
Pathway benchmark

How does Daniel compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.