Xander van der Westhuizen

Bowling – Opening Bowler WA
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings 🎥 Video 4
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: Scarborough Sharks Cricket Club
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Needs Work
8/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Needs Work
31/100
Batting Working on Basics
not rated — working on basics
Bowling Proficient
58/100

Representative pathway — 0 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Body of work — 12 imported matches (+0.2)

Critical recommendations

high Batting
Vulnerable to the straight ball

4 of 5 dismissals are bowled/LBW — likely playing across the front pad or leaving a gate. Work on a straighter bat path and head position over the ball.

medium Batting
High duck rate

Out for 0 in 22% of imported innings. Build a repeatable start routine: watch the ball out of the hand, score first run with low-risk pushes.

Strengths

  • ✓ Builds pressure with a tight economy of 3.36.
  • ✓ Reliable in the field — contributes a dismissal every second match.
How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 31 × 40% · Batting not rated (weight redistributed) · Bowling 58 × 30%. Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.30 for the level played (Club 8). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
Rated on the last 8 matches since 28 Oct 2024. Older cricket still shows in the career figures but does not count.
Fielding
Outfield: 4 catches + 2 run outs (2 direct, 0 assisted) in 12 matches — 0.50 per match.
Batting
Not rated: 9 innings at 16.2 average — below the 20 floor needed to be presented as a batter.
Bowling
15 wickets in 12 matches — 1.25 per match at 20.4, economy 3.36, strike rate 36.4.

Fielding — imported matches (12)

4
Ct (field)
0
Ct (WK)
0.33
Catches / match
2
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
6
Total dismissals
0.5
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

101
Runs (9 inns)
16.21
Avg (adj)
77.78
Strike rate
59
High score
4
Not outs
8
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

15
Wickets (91 ov)
3.36
Economy
20.4
Average
9
Maidens
0.13
Extras / over
36.4
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 12 imported
Batting 101 runs in 9 inns @ 16.21 (SR 77.78)
Milestones 0×100, 1×50, HS 59, 2 ducks
Bowling 15 wkts @ 20.4 (econ 3.36, SR 36.4)
Best / 5WI 7-12 · 1 five-fors
Fielding 4 ct, 2 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 6 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

0.33
Catches / match
0.5
Dismissals / match

Across 12 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2025/26 2 2 0 0* 0 0 0 0
2024/25 3 1 11 8 4.89 78.57 0 0
2023/24 2 1 31 28* 23.25 79.49 0 0
2022/23 2 0 59 59 29.5 — 1 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2025/26 23 3 69 1 69 3 138
2024/25 40 2 143 11 13 3.58 21.8
2023/24 15 2 52 2 26 3.47 45
2022/23 13 2 42 1 42 3.23 78

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2025/26 2 0 0 0 2
2024/25 1 0 0 0 1
2023/24 1 0 0 0 1
2022/23 0 0 2 0 2
Pathway benchmark

How does Xander compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.