Jesse Shanks (30)

Bowling – Opening Bowler U16 (2011/12)
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: Wingello Tigers Cricket Club
Age: Born on/after 1 Sep 1995 (inferred from U16 eligibility, 2011/12 season)
Green Shield: 0 season(s) played · last GS year 2011/12 (ages out of U16 after this)
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Needs Work
7/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Proficient
35/100
Batting Working on Basics
not rated — working on basics
Bowling Proficient
50/100

Representative pathway — 0 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Body of work — 9 imported matches (+0.2)

Critical recommendations

high Batting
Getting starts but not surviving

Adjusted average of 14.8 over 9 innings. Focus on the first 15 balls: leave/defend percentages, judgement outside off stump.

medium Batting
High duck rate

Out for 0 in 11% of imported innings. Build a repeatable start routine: watch the ball out of the hand, score first run with low-risk pushes.

medium Bowling
Tight but not threatening

Economy of 3.58 is excellent but a wicket every 50 balls is slow. Develop a genuine wicket-taking variation and attack the stumps more.

Strengths

  • ✓ Builds pressure with a tight economy of 3.58.
How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 35 × 40% · Batting not rated (weight redistributed) · Bowling 50 × 30%. Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.30 for the level played (Club 9). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
No match in the last 2 years, so not ranked. The rating shown is from the career.
Fielding
Outfield: 3 catches + 0 run outs (0 direct, 0 assisted) in 9 matches — 0.33 per match.
Batting
Not rated: 9 innings at 14.8 average — below the 20 floor needed to be presented as a batter.
Bowling
6 wickets in 9 matches — 0.67 per match at 29.8, economy 3.58, strike rate 50.0.

Fielding — imported matches (9)

3
Ct (field)
0
Ct (WK)
0.33
Catches / match
0
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
3
Total dismissals
0.33
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

120
Runs (9 inns)
14.81
Avg (adj)
—
Strike rate
30
High score
1
Not outs
3
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

6
Wickets (50 ov)
3.58
Economy
29.83
Average
2
Maidens
0
Extras / over
50
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 9 imported
Batting 120 runs in 9 inns @ 14.81 (SR —)
Milestones 0×100, 0×50, HS 30, 1 ducks
Bowling 6 wkts @ 29.83 (econ 3.58, SR 50)
Best / 5WI 2-36 · 0 five-fors
Fielding 3 ct, 0 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 3 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

0.33
Catches / match
0.33
Dismissals / match

Across 9 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2011/12 6 0 57 17 9.5 — 0 0
2010/11 3 1 63 30* 28 — 0 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2011/12 25 1 101 5 20.2 4.04 30
2010/11 25 1 78 1 78 3.12 150

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2011/12 3 0 0 0 3
Pathway benchmark

How does Jesse compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.