SEAMUS SHARKEY

Bowling – First-Change Bowler NT Anchor / accumulator
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: PINT Cricket Club
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Needs Work
4/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Needs Work
12/100
Batting Working on Basics
not rated — working on basics
Bowling Strong
~58/100
discounted — banded on wickets per match

Representative pathway — 1 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Body of work — 27 imported matches (+0.5)

Critical recommendations

high Batting
Strike rotation needs urgent work

Strike rate of 36.7 means long dot-ball chains and pressure on partners. Drill singles into gaps, soft-hand placement, and calling.

medium Bowling
Tight but not threatening

Economy of 2.56 is excellent but a wicket every 49 balls is slow. Develop a genuine wicket-taking variation and attack the stumps more.

Strengths

How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 12 × 40% · Batting not rated (weight redistributed) · Bowling 58 × 30%. Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.30 for the level played (Club 27). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
No match in the last 2 years, so not ranked. The rating shown is from the career.
Fielding
Outfield: 9 catches + 0 run outs (0 direct, 0 assisted) in 27 matches — 0.33 per match.
Batting
Not rated: 25 innings at 29.5 average — below the 20 floor needed to be presented as a batter.
Bowling
17 wickets in 19 matches bowled in (of 27 played) — 0.89 per match at 20.9, economy 2.56, strike rate 49.1.

Fielding — imported matches (27)

9
Ct (field)
0
Ct (WK)
0.33
Catches / match
0
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
9
Total dismissals
0.33
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

636
Runs (25 inns)
29.51
Avg (adj)
36.69
Strike rate
105
High score
4
Not outs
4
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

17
Wickets (139 ov)
2.56
Economy
20.94
Average
32
Maidens
0.01
Extras / over
49.1
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 27 imported
Batting 636 runs in 25 inns @ 29.51 (SR 36.69)
Milestones 1×100, 2×50, HS 105, 0 ducks
Bowling 17 wkts @ 20.94 (econ 2.56, SR 49.1)
Best / 5WI 3-21 · 0 five-fors
Fielding 9 ct, 0 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 9 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

0.33
Catches / match
0.33
Dismissals / match

Across 27 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2018/19 1 0 7 7 7 18.92 0 0
2017/18 4 0 36 22 9 53.73 0 0
2016/17 3 0 104 65 34.67 37.82 1 0
2015/16 6 0 136 40 22.67 70.47 0 0
2014/15 3 2 150 85 83.33 — 1 0
2012/13 4 1 54 27 16.88 — 0 0
2011/12 2 0 37 36 18.5 — 0 0
2010/11 2 1 112 105* 84 339.39 0 1

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2018/19 10 3 28 2 14 2.8 30
2016/17 25 7 53 6 8.83 2.12 25
2015/16 42 11 102 5 20.4 2.43 50.4
2014/15 12 2 25 0 — 2.08 —
2012/13 22 2 73 2 36.5 3.32 66
2011/12 11 2 34 2 17 3.09 33
2010/11 17 5 41 0 — 2.41 —

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2015/16 3 0 0 0 3
2014/15 3 0 0 0 3
2012/13 1 0 0 0 1
2011/12 1 0 0 0 1
2010/11 1 0 0 0 1
Pathway benchmark

How does SEAMUS compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.