Matthew Tucker

Bowling – First-Change Bowler SA Anchor / accumulator
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: Adelaide Cricket Club
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Needs Work
15/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Needs Work
28/100
Batting Working on Basics
not rated — working on basics
Bowling Proficient
30/100

Representative pathway — 7 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Premier or state pathway — 17 matches (+6.8)
  • ● Body of work — 17 imported matches (+0.3)

Critical recommendations

high Batting
Getting starts but not surviving

Adjusted average of 7.7 over 11 innings. Focus on the first 15 balls: leave/defend percentages, judgement outside off stump.

medium Batting
Boundary-or-block scoring pattern

119% of runs come in boundaries yet the strike rate is modest — between boundaries the scoreboard stalls. Add strike rotation to keep bowlers from settling.

medium Bowling
Tight but not threatening

Economy of 2.93 is excellent but a wicket every 62 balls is slow. Develop a genuine wicket-taking variation and attack the stumps more.

Strengths

  • ✓ Builds pressure with a tight economy of 2.93.
How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 28 × 40% · Batting not rated (weight redistributed) · Bowling 30 × 30%. Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.60 for the level played (2nd grade 17). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
No match in the last 2 years, so not ranked. The rating shown is from the career.
Fielding
Outfield: 5 catches + 0 run outs (0 direct, 0 assisted) in 17 matches — 0.29 per match.
Batting
Not rated: 11 innings at 7.7 average — below the 20 floor needed to be presented as a batter.
Bowling
20 wickets in 16 matches bowled in (of 17 played) — 1.25 per match at 30.1, economy 2.93, strike rate 61.6.

Fielding — imported matches (17)

5
Ct (field)
0
Ct (WK)
0.29
Catches / match
0
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
5
Total dismissals
0.29
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

62
Runs (11 inns)
7.69
Avg (adj)
46.9
Strike rate
17
High score
4
Not outs
11
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

20
Wickets (205.2 ov)
2.93
Economy
30.05
Average
49
Maidens
0.08
Extras / over
61.6
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 17 imported
Batting 62 runs in 11 inns @ 7.69 (SR 46.9)
Milestones 0×100, 0×50, HS 17, 1 ducks
Bowling 20 wkts @ 30.05 (econ 2.93, SR 61.6)
Best / 5WI 3-66 · 0 five-fors
Fielding 5 ct, 0 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 5 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

0.29
Catches / match
0.29
Dismissals / match

Across 17 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2009/10 8 4 53 17* 9.94 46.9 0 0
2008/09 3 0 9 8 3 — 0 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2009/10 151.2 36 467 16 29.19 3.09 56.7
2008/09 54 13 134 4 33.5 2.48 81

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2009/10 5 0 0 0 5
Pathway benchmark

How does Matthew compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.