Danyon Newcombe

Bowling – Second-Change Bowler QLD
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: Richmond Union Cricket Club · USC Cricket Club
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Needs Work
5/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Needs Work
17/100
Batting Working on Basics
not rated — working on basics
Bowling Proficient
50/100

Representative pathway — 1 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Body of work — 29 imported matches (+0.6)

Critical recommendations

high Batting
Getting starts but not surviving

Adjusted average of 3.6 over 17 innings. Focus on the first 15 balls: leave/defend percentages, judgement outside off stump.

medium Batting
High duck rate

Out for 0 in 18% of imported innings. Build a repeatable start routine: watch the ball out of the hand, score first run with low-risk pushes.

medium Bowling
Tight but not threatening

Economy of 3.20 is excellent but a wicket every 40 balls is slow. Develop a genuine wicket-taking variation and attack the stumps more.

Strengths

  • ✓ Builds pressure with a tight economy of 3.20.
How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 17 × 40% · Batting not rated (weight redistributed) · Bowling 50 × 30%. Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.30 for the level played (Club 29). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
No match in the last 2 years, so not ranked. The rating shown is from the career.
Fielding
Outfield: 8 catches + 0 run outs (0 direct, 0 assisted) in 29 matches — 0.28 per match.
Batting
Not rated: 17 innings at 3.6 average — below the 20 floor needed to be presented as a batter.
Bowling
31 wickets in 26 matches bowled in (of 29 played) — 1.19 per match at 21.4, economy 3.20, strike rate 40.1.

Fielding — imported matches (29)

8
Ct (field)
0
Ct (WK)
0.28
Catches / match
0
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
8
Total dismissals
0.28
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

42
Runs (17 inns)
3.63
Avg (adj)
26.67
Strike rate
11
High score
8
Not outs
11
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

31
Wickets (207.3 ov)
3.2
Economy
21.39
Average
31
Maidens
0.28
Extras / over
40.1
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 29 imported
Batting 42 runs in 17 inns @ 3.63 (SR 26.67)
Milestones 0×100, 0×50, HS 11, 3 ducks
Bowling 31 wkts @ 21.39 (econ 3.2, SR 40.1)
Best / 5WI 5-63 · 1 five-fors
Fielding 8 ct, 0 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 8 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

0.28
Catches / match
0.28
Dismissals / match

Across 29 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2021/22 6 3 14 7* 3.5 107.69 0 0
2020/21 7 4 13 6 2.92 650 0 0
2019/20 1 0 0 0 0 — 0 0
2018/19 2 1 12 11* 9 — 0 0
2017/18 1 0 3 3 3 — 0 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2021/22 62.8 10 212 8 26.5 3.37 47.1
2020/21 121 20 334 18 18.56 2.76 40.3
2019/20 14 0 63 5 12.6 4.5 16.8
2018/19 9.5 1 54 0 — 5.68 —

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2021/22 1 0 0 0 1
2020/21 5 0 0 0 5
2019/20 1 0 0 0 1
2018/19 1 0 0 0 1
Pathway benchmark

How does Danyon compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.