Joshua Pelentsov (29)

Bowling – Third-Change Bowler U14 (2010/11) SA
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: Port Adelaide Cricket Club · Gepps Cross Cricket Club
Age: Born on/after 1 Sep 1996 (inferred from U14 eligibility, 2010/11 season)
Green Shield: 0 season(s) played · last GS year 2012/13 (ages out of U16 after this)
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Needs Work
0/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Needs Work
0/100
Batting Working on Basics
not rated — working on basics
Bowling
Not enough data

Representative pathway — 1 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Premier or state pathway — 2 matches (+0.8)
  • ● Body of work — 8 imported matches (+0.2)

Critical recommendations

high Batting
Getting starts but not surviving

Adjusted average of 8.0 over 11 innings. Focus on the first 15 balls: leave/defend percentages, judgement outside off stump.

high Batting
Vulnerable to the straight ball

5 of 10 dismissals are bowled/LBW — likely playing across the front pad or leaving a gate. Work on a straighter bat path and head position over the ball.

medium Batting
High duck rate

Out for 0 in 27% of imported innings. Build a repeatable start routine: watch the ball out of the hand, score first run with low-risk pushes.

Strengths

How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 0 × 40% · Batting not rated (weight redistributed) · Bowling not rated (weight redistributed). Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.39 for the level played (Rep Div 1 2 · Club 6). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
No match in the last 2 years, so not ranked. The rating shown is from the career.
Fielding
Outfield: 0 catches + 0 run outs (0 direct, 0 assisted) in 8 matches — 0.00 per match.
Batting
Not rated: 11 innings at 8.0 average — below the 20 floor needed to be presented as a batter.
Bowling
Not rated: 5 wickets from 23.3 overs across 5 matches bowled in (of 8 played) — 1.00 per match, under the 0.25 floor. Bowls too rarely to judge.

Fielding — imported matches (8)

0
Ct (field)
0
Ct (WK)
0
Catches / match
0
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
0
Total dismissals
0
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

81
Runs (11 inns)
8.03
Avg (adj)
15
Strike rate
54
High score
1
Not outs
7
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

5
Wickets (23.3 ov)
4.37
Economy
20.4
Average
1
Maidens
0.09
Extras / over
28
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 8 imported
Batting 81 runs in 11 inns @ 8.03 (SR 15)
Milestones 0×100, 1×50, HS 54, 3 ducks
Bowling 5 wkts @ 20.4 (econ 4.37, SR 28)
Best / 5WI 2-11 · 0 five-fors
Fielding 0 ct, 0 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2012/13 3 0 16 15 5.33 — 0 0
2010/11 4 0 4 2 1 20 0 0
2009/10 3 0 60 54 20 — 1 0
2008/09 1 1 1 1* 1 — 0 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2012/13 12 1 64 1 64 5.33 72
2010/11 6 0 22 1 22 3.67 36
2009/10 2 0 5 1 5 2.5 12
2008/09 3.3 0 11 2 5.5 3.3 10
Pathway benchmark

How does Joshua compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.