Nathan Porter
Batting – Top-Order Batter
NSW
Anchor / accumulator
📈 Journey
📊 Rankings
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Likely same player — one-click merge
play.cricket
Nathan Porter
NSW · 26 matches ·
50% match
play.cricket
Nathan Porter
— · 31 matches ·
25% match
play.cricket
Nathan Porter
NSW · 24 matches ·
25% match
play.cricket
Nathan Porter
NSW · 13 matches ·
25% match
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Overall
Needs Work
6/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding
Needs Work
28/100
Batting
Working on Basics
not rated — working on basics
Bowling
Not enough data
Representative pathway — 0 pathway points in the overall rating
- ● Body of work — 22 imported matches (+0.4)
Critical recommendations
high
Batting
Strike rotation needs urgent work
Strike rate of 30.8 means long dot-ball chains and pressure on partners. Drill singles into gaps, soft-hand placement, and calling.
high
Batting
Vulnerable to the straight ball
9 of 18 dismissals are bowled/LBW — likely playing across the front pad or leaving a gate. Work on a straighter bat path and head position over the ball.
Strengths
How these ratings are calculated
- Overall
- Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 28 × 40% · Batting not rated (weight redistributed) · Bowling not rated (weight redistributed). Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
- Level
- ×0.30 for the level played (Club 22). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
- Form
- No match in the last 2 years, so not ranked. The rating shown is from the career.
- Fielding
- Outfield: 6 catches + 2 run outs (2 direct, 0 assisted) in 22 matches — 0.36 per match.
- Batting
- Not rated: 19 innings at 19.4 average — below the 20 floor needed to be presented as a batter.
- Bowling
- Not rated: 0 wickets from 4.0 overs across 1 matches bowled in (of 22 played) — 0.00 per match, under the 0.25 floor. Bowls too rarely to judge.
Fielding — imported matches (22)
6
Ct (field)
0
Ct (WK)
0.27
Catches / match
2
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
8
Total dismissals
0.36
Dismissals / match
Batting — imported matches
350
Runs (19 inns)
19.39
Avg (adj)
30.77
Strike rate
62
High score
1
Not outs
4
Median position
Century (100+)
Fifty (50–99)
Not out (under 50)
Out (under 50)
Bowling — imported matches
0
Wickets (4 ov)
10.5
Economy
—
Average
0
Maidens
0.25
Extras / over
—
Strike rate
Dismissal pattern
Imported-match summary
| Matches | 22 imported |
| Batting | 350 runs in 19 inns @ 19.39 (SR 30.77) |
| Milestones | 0×100, 1×50, HS 62, 1 ducks |
| Bowling | 0 wkts @ — (econ 10.5, SR —) |
| Best / 5WI | 0-42 · 0 five-fors |
| Fielding | 6 ct, 2 RO, 0 st |
All figures from imported scorecards only.
Further analysis
Batting form
Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).
Score distribution
How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.
Scoring tempo
Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.
Fielding contribution
Breakdown of the 8 dismissals they were involved in.
Per-match fielding rate
0.27
Catches / match
0.36
Dismissals / match
Across 22 imported match(es).
Season by season
Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.
Batting
| Season | Inns | NO | Runs | HS | Avg | SR | 50 | 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018/19 | 5 | 0 | 102 | 45 | 20.4 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2017/18 | 2 | 0 | 24 | 17 | 12 | 75 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016/17 | 2 | 0 | 64 | 62 | 32 | — | 1 | 0 |
| 2014/15 | 5 | 0 | 71 | 24 | 14.2 | 1014.29 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013/14 | 5 | 1 | 89 | 41 | 21.36 | — | 0 | 0 |
Bowling
| Season | Overs | Mdns | Runs | Wkts | Avg | Econ | SR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018/19 | 4 | 0 | 42 | 0 | — | 10.5 | — |
Fielding
| Season | Ct | WK Ct | RO | St | Dismissals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018/19 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017/18 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| 2014/15 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| 2013/14 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Pathway benchmark
How does Nathan compare?
Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.