Senad Levic

Batting – Top-Order Batter VIC
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: Kingsville Cricket Club
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Needs Work
12/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Advance
63/100
Batting Advance
75/100
Bowling Proficient
51/100

Representative pathway — 0 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Body of work — 12 imported matches (+0.2)

Critical recommendations

medium Bowling
Tight but not threatening

Economy of 3.49 is excellent but a wicket every 45 balls is slow. Develop a genuine wicket-taking variation and attack the stumps more.

info Fielding
Fielding is a selection weapon

0.92 catches per match is elite for this level — keep it visible by taking the hardest catching positions in big games.

Strengths

  • ✓ Consistent run-scorer — adjusted average 38.9.
  • ✓ Proven ability to go big — 1 hundred(s), best of 108.
  • ✓ Builds pressure with a tight economy of 3.49.
  • ✓ Safe hands — 11 catches in 12 matches (0.92 per match), a genuine selection asset.
How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 63 × 40% · Batting 75 × 30% · Bowling 51 × 30%. Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.30 for the level played (Club 12). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
No match in the last 2 years, so not ranked. The rating shown is from the career.
Fielding
Outfield: 11 catches + 0 run outs (0 direct, 0 assisted) in 12 matches — 0.92 per match.
Batting
392 runs in 11 innings, adjusted average 38.9. Qualifies on the floors (avg ≥ 20, SR ≥ 40).
Bowling
10 wickets in 8 matches bowled in (of 12 played) — 1.25 per match at 26.3, economy 3.49, strike rate 45.2.

Fielding — imported matches (12)

11
Ct (field)
0
Ct (WK)
0.92
Catches / match
0
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
11
Total dismissals
0.92
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

392
Runs (11 inns)
38.88
Avg (adj)
—
Strike rate
108
High score
1
Not outs
3
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

10
Wickets (75.3 ov)
3.49
Economy
26.3
Average
15
Maidens
0.03
Extras / over
45.2
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 12 imported
Batting 392 runs in 11 inns @ 38.88 (SR —)
Milestones 1×100, 2×50, HS 108, 0 ducks
Bowling 10 wkts @ 26.3 (econ 3.49, SR 45.2)
Best / 5WI 3-83 · 0 five-fors
Fielding 11 ct, 0 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 11 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

0.92
Catches / match
0.92
Dismissals / match

Across 12 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2017/18 6 1 285 108* 55.42 — 2 1
2016/17 1 0 9 9 9 — 0 0
2015/16 1 0 38 38 38 — 0 0
2013/14 1 0 10 10 10 — 0 0
2009/10 2 0 50 31 25 — 0 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2017/18 34 12 65 3 21.67 1.91 68
2016/17 8 0 45 1 45 5.63 48
2013/14 11 1 47 2 23.5 4.27 33
2009/10 22.3 2 106 4 26.5 4.75 33.5

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2017/18 10 0 0 0 10
2015/16 1 0 0 0 1
Pathway benchmark

How does Senad compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.