Wesley Dejong (29)

Bowling – Opening Bowler U14 (2010/11) VIC
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: Werribee Juniors Cricket Club Inc · Werribee Cricket Club · Metropolitan West
Age: Born on/after 1 Sep 1996 (inferred from U14 eligibility, 2010/11 season)
Green Shield: 0 season(s) played · last GS year 2012/13 (ages out of U16 after this)
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Needs Work
12/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Needs Work
27/100
Batting Working on Basics
not rated — working on basics
Bowling Strong
~42/100
discounted — banded on wickets per match

Representative pathway — 0 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Body of work — 13 imported matches (+0.3)

Critical recommendations

high Batting
Getting starts but not surviving

Adjusted average of 11.6 over 10 innings. Focus on the first 15 balls: leave/defend percentages, judgement outside off stump.

medium Bowling
Tight but not threatening

Economy of 3.79 is excellent but a wicket every 60 balls is slow. Develop a genuine wicket-taking variation and attack the stumps more.

Strengths

How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 27 × 40% · Batting not rated (weight redistributed) · Bowling 42 × 30%. Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.50 for the level played (Rep Div 1 7 · Club 6). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
No match in the last 2 years, so not ranked. The rating shown is from the career.
Fielding
Outfield: 3 catches + 1 run outs (1 direct, 0 assisted) in 13 matches — 0.31 per match.
Batting
Not rated: 10 innings at 11.6 average — below the 20 floor needed to be presented as a batter.
Bowling
5 wickets in 13 matches — 0.38 per match at 38.2, economy 3.79, strike rate 60.4.

Fielding — imported matches (13)

3
Ct (field)
0
Ct (WK)
0.23
Catches / match
1
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
4
Total dismissals
0.31
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

83
Runs (10 inns)
11.62
Avg (adj)
—
Strike rate
20
High score
4
Not outs
7
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

5
Wickets (50.3 ov)
3.79
Economy
38.2
Average
9
Maidens
0.04
Extras / over
60.4
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 13 imported
Batting 83 runs in 10 inns @ 11.62 (SR —)
Milestones 0×100, 0×50, HS 20, 0 ducks
Bowling 5 wkts @ 38.2 (econ 3.79, SR 60.4)
Best / 5WI 2-14 · 0 five-fors
Fielding 3 ct, 1 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 4 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

0.23
Catches / match
0.31
Dismissals / match

Across 13 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2011/12 3 2 42 20 23.33 — 0 0
2010/11 2 0 5 3 2.5 — 0 0
2009/10 4 2 23 10* 8.63 — 0 0
2005/06 1 0 13 13 13 — 0 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2011/12 18.3 4 48 3 16 2.62 36.7
2010/11 7 0 54 1 54 7.71 42
2009/10 21 4 81 1 81 3.86 126
2005/06 4 1 8 0 — 2 —

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2011/12 2 0 0 0 2
2009/10 1 0 1 0 2
Pathway benchmark

How does Wesley compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.