Sean Clingeleffer

Fielding – Wicketkeeper-Batter TAS Anchor / accumulator
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: North Hobart Cricket Club · New Town Cricket Club · Narre North Cricket Club
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Proficient
51/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Elite
98/100
Batting Proficient
46/100
Bowling
Not enough data

Representative pathway — 12 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Premier or state pathway — 69 matches (+10.0)
  • ● Regional representative — 5 matches (+0.8)
  • ● Body of work — 76 imported matches (+1.5)

Critical recommendations

high Batting
Strike rotation needs urgent work

Strike rate of 55.9 means long dot-ball chains and pressure on partners. Drill singles into gaps, soft-hand placement, and calling.

medium Batting
Not converting fifties into hundreds

Only 0% of 50+ scores become hundreds (5 fifties, 0 hundreds). Practise batting in long blocks and resetting targets at 50.

info Fielding
Fielding is a selection weapon

1.33 catches per match is elite for this level — keep it visible by taking the hardest catching positions in big games.

Strengths

  • ✓ Safe hands — 101 catches in 76 matches (1.33 per match), a genuine selection asset.
  • ✓ Sharp glovework — 18 stumpings.
How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 98 × 40% · Batting 46 × 30% · Bowling not rated (weight redistributed). Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.83 for the level played (1st grade 74 · Club 2). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
No match in the last 2 years, so not ranked. The rating shown is from the career.
Fielding
Keeping: 99 catches + 18 stumpings + 2 run outs (2 direct, 0 assisted) in 76 matches — 1.57 dismissals per match.
Batting
1,495 runs in 68 innings, adjusted average 26.2, strike rate 55.9. Qualifies on the floors (avg ≥ 20, SR ≥ 40).

Fielding — imported matches (76)

2
Ct (field)
99
Ct (WK)
1.33
Catches / match
2
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
18
Stumpings
121
Total dismissals
1.59
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

1495
Runs (68 inns)
26.19
Avg (adj)
55.86
Strike rate
98
High score
13
Not outs
5
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

0
Wickets (0 ov)
—
Economy
—
Average
0
Maidens
—
Extras / over
—
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 76 imported
Batting 1495 runs in 68 inns @ 26.19 (SR 55.86)
Milestones 0×100, 5×50, HS 98, 4 ducks
Bowling 0 wkts @ — (econ —, SR —)
Best / 5WI — · 0 five-fors
Fielding 101 ct, 2 RO, 18 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 121 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

1.33
Catches / match
1.59
Dismissals / match

Across 76 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2010/11 14 2 179 30 14.61 47.99 0 0
2009/10 19 7 431 66 31.04 53.41 1 0
2008/09 16 3 361 60 26.79 68.63 1 0
2007/08 2 0 18 11 9 75 0 0
2006/07 5 1 119 98 28.56 54.84 1 0
2005/06 7 0 251 97 35.86 — 1 0
2004/05 5 0 136 76 27.2 — 1 0

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2010/11 0 18 0 0 18
2009/10 0 37 2 11 50
2008/09 0 25 0 5 30
2006/07 2 8 0 1 11
2005/06 0 7 0 0 7
2004/05 0 4 0 1 5
Pathway benchmark

How does Sean compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.