🏅 Liam Reynolds (39)

Bowling – First-Change Bowler U19 (2005/06) TAS Anchor / accumulator
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Likely same player — one-click merge
play.cricket
Liam Reynolds
TAS · 106 matches · 25% match
play.cricket
Liam Reynolds
TAS · 30 matches · 25% match
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: TAS · Tasmania
Age: Born on/after 1 Sep 1986 (inferred from U19 eligibility, 2005/06 season)
Green Shield: 0 season(s) played · last GS year 2002/03 (ages out of U16 after this)
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Proficient
44/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Needs Work
0/100
Batting Working on Basics
not rated — working on basics
Bowling Advance
59/100

Representative pathway — 26 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● State representation (+12)
  • ● National championships — 11 matches (+14.0)
  • ● Body of work — 11 imported matches (+0.2)

Critical recommendations

high Batting
Strike rotation needs urgent work

Strike rate of 44.8 means long dot-ball chains and pressure on partners. Drill singles into gaps, soft-hand placement, and calling.

high Fielding
Catching return too low for selection

Only 0.00 catches per match over 11 matches. Fielding is the first thing selectors compare when batting/bowling are close — make catching the priority: 30 high balls + 30 flat catches per session, and ask to field in the ring/slips where chances come.

Strengths

How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 0 × 40% · Batting not rated (weight redistributed) · Bowling 59 × 30%. Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×1.00 for the level played (National competition 11). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
No match in the last 2 years, so not ranked. The rating shown is from the career.
Fielding
Outfield: 0 catches + 0 run outs (0 direct, 0 assisted) in 11 matches — 0.00 per match.
Batting
Not rated: 13 innings at 17.5 average — below the 20 floor needed to be presented as a batter.
Bowling
14 wickets in 10 matches bowled in (of 11 played) — 1.40 per match at 22.4, economy 4.05, strike rate 33.1.

Fielding — imported matches (11)

0
Ct (field)
0
Ct (WK)
0
Catches / match
0
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
0
Total dismissals
0
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

211
Runs (13 inns)
17.48
Avg (adj)
44.8
Strike rate
39
High score
1
Not outs
3
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

14
Wickets (77.3 ov)
4.05
Economy
22.36
Average
10
Maidens
0
Extras / over
33.1
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 11 imported
Batting 211 runs in 13 inns @ 17.48 (SR 44.8)
Milestones 0×100, 0×50, HS 39, 1 ducks
Bowling 14 wkts @ 22.36 (econ 4.05, SR 33.1)
Best / 5WI 5-13 · 1 five-fors
Fielding 0 ct, 0 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2004/05 8 1 115 31 16.17 45.28 0 0
2003/04 5 0 96 39 19.2 51.06 0 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2004/05 34.3 6 138 11 12.55 4.02 18.7
2003/04 43 4 175 3 58.33 4.07 86
Pathway benchmark

How does Liam compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.