Xavier Gercovich

Bowling – First-Change Bowler VIC Anchor / accumulator
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings 🎥 Video 6
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Likely same player — one-click merge
play.cricket
Xavier Gercovich
VIC · 108 matches · 100% match
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: Warrnambool Cricket Club
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Needs Work
5/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Needs Work
17/100
Batting Working on Basics
not rated — working on basics
Bowling Strong
~29/100
discounted — banded on wickets per match

Representative pathway — 0 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Body of work — 23 imported matches (+0.5)

Critical recommendations

high Batting
Getting starts but not surviving

Adjusted average of 9.7 over 23 innings. Focus on the first 15 balls: leave/defend percentages, judgement outside off stump.

medium Batting
High duck rate

Out for 0 in 26% of imported innings. Build a repeatable start routine: watch the ball out of the hand, score first run with low-risk pushes.

Strengths

How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 17 × 40% · Batting not rated (weight redistributed) · Bowling 29 × 30%. Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.30 for the level played (Club 17). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
Rated on the last 17 matches since 1 Nov 2024. Older cricket still shows in the career figures but does not count.
Fielding
Outfield: 4 catches + 2 run outs (0 direct, 2 assisted) in 23 matches — 0.26 per match.
Batting
Not rated: 23 innings at 9.7 average — below the 20 floor needed to be presented as a batter.
Bowling
5 wickets in 13 matches bowled in (of 23 played) — 0.38 per match at 54.8, economy 4.07, strike rate 80.8.

Fielding — imported matches (23)

4
Ct (field)
0
Ct (WK)
0.17
Catches / match
0
RO (direct)
2
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
6
Total dismissals
0.26
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

197
Runs (23 inns)
9.68
Avg (adj)
36.28
Strike rate
39
High score
3
Not outs
4
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

5
Wickets (67.3 ov)
4.07
Economy
54.8
Average
5
Maidens
0.24
Extras / over
80.8
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 23 imported
Batting 197 runs in 23 inns @ 9.68 (SR 36.28)
Milestones 0×100, 0×50, HS 39, 6 ducks
Bowling 5 wkts @ 54.8 (econ 4.07, SR 80.8)
Best / 5WI 3-20 · 0 five-fors
Fielding 4 ct, 2 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 6 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

0.17
Catches / match
0.26
Dismissals / match

Across 23 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2026/27 2 0 9 9 4.5 52.94 0 0
2025/26 14 2 135 34 11.02 35.53 0 0
2024/25 2 0 39 39 19.5 37.14 0 0
2023/24 5 1 14 10* 3.36 34.15 0 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2025/26 45.3 3 160 5 32 3.53 54.4
2024/25 6 0 57 0 — 9.5 —
2023/24 16 2 57 0 — 3.56 —

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2026/27 1 0 0 0 1
2025/26 1 0 2 0 3
2024/25 1 0 0 0 1
2023/24 1 0 0 0 1
Pathway benchmark

How does Xavier compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.