Christopher Barker

Bowling – First-Change Bowler QLD Balanced scorer
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Likely same player — one-click merge
play.cricket
Christopher Barker
QLD · 28 matches · 75% match
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: Redlands Tigers Cricket
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Needs Work
4/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Needs Work
25/100
Batting Working on Basics
not rated — working on basics
Bowling
Not enough data

Representative pathway — 1 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Regional representative — 4 matches (+0.6)
  • ● Body of work — 4 imported matches (+0.1)

Critical recommendations

high Batting
Getting starts but not surviving

Adjusted average of 3.7 over 6 innings. Focus on the first 15 balls: leave/defend percentages, judgement outside off stump.

high Batting
Vulnerable to the straight ball

4 of 5 dismissals are bowled/LBW — likely playing across the front pad or leaving a gate. Work on a straighter bat path and head position over the ball.

medium Batting
Boundary-or-block scoring pattern

84% of runs come in boundaries yet the strike rate is modest — between boundaries the scoreboard stalls. Add strike rotation to keep bowlers from settling.

Strengths

How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 25 × 40% · Batting not rated (weight redistributed) · Bowling not rated (weight redistributed). Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.22 for the level played (4th grade 1 · 5th grade and below 3). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
No match in the last 2 years, so not ranked. The rating shown is from the career.
Fielding
Outfield: 0 catches + 1 run outs (1 direct, 0 assisted) in 4 matches — 0.25 per match.
Batting
Not rated: 6 innings at 3.7 average — below the 20 floor needed to be presented as a batter.
Bowling
Not rated: 3 wickets from 15.0 overs across 4 matches — 0.75 per match, under the 0.25 floor. Bowls too rarely to judge.

Fielding — imported matches (4)

0
Ct (field)
0
Ct (WK)
0
Catches / match
1
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
1
Total dismissals
0.25
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

19
Runs (6 inns)
3.69
Avg (adj)
76
Strike rate
8
High score
1
Not outs
8
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

3
Wickets (15 ov)
4.93
Economy
24.67
Average
0
Maidens
0.73
Extras / over
30
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 4 imported
Batting 19 runs in 6 inns @ 3.69 (SR 76)
Milestones 0×100, 0×50, HS 8, 1 ducks
Bowling 3 wkts @ 24.67 (econ 4.93, SR 30)
Best / 5WI 1-6 · 0 five-fors
Fielding 0 ct, 1 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 1 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

0
Catches / match
0.25
Dismissals / match

Across 4 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2024/25 6 1 19 8 3.69 76 0 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2024/25 15 0 74 3 24.67 4.93 30

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2024/25 0 0 1 0 1
Pathway benchmark

How does Christopher compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.