Luke Jacobs (25)

★ Div 1 Rep Bowling – Opening Bowler U15 (2015/16) NSW Anchor / accumulator
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings 🎥 Video 65
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Likely same player — one-click merge
play.cricket
Luke Jacobs
NSW · 52 matches · 50% match
play.cricket
Luke Jacobs
NSW · 8 matches · 50% match
play.cricket
Luke Jacobs
NSW · 4 matches · 25% match
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: Gordon District Cricket Club (Premier) · University of Newcastle Cricket Club · Sydney Cricket Club · Lisarow Ourimbah Cricket Club · Central Coast Cricket Association · Lisarow-Ourimbah Junior Cricket Club
District represented: Central Coast (junior rep association)
Age: Born on/after 1 Sep 2000 (inferred from U15 eligibility, 2015/16 season)
Green Shield: 0 season(s) played · last GS year 2016/17 (ages out of U16 after this)
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Needs Work
27/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Needs Work
27/100
Batting Working on Basics
not rated — working on basics
Bowling Proficient
38/100

Representative pathway — 19 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Division 1 representative (+4)
  • ● Premier or state pathway — 26 matches (+10.0)
  • ● Regional representative — 2 matches (+0.3)
  • ● Body of work — 259 imported matches (+5.0)

Critical recommendations

high Batting
Getting starts but not surviving

Adjusted average of 8.1 over 183 innings. Focus on the first 15 balls: leave/defend percentages, judgement outside off stump.

medium Batting
High duck rate

Out for 0 in 21% of imported innings. Build a repeatable start routine: watch the ball out of the hand, score first run with low-risk pushes.

Strengths

  • ✓ Builds pressure with a tight economy of 3.73.
  • ✓ Dangerous ground fielder — involved in 19 run outs.
How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 27 × 40% · Batting not rated (weight redistributed) · Bowling 38 × 30%. Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.70 for the level played (1st grade 24 · 2nd grade 4 · Club 8). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
Rated on the last 36 matches since 28 Oct 2024. Older cricket still shows in the career figures but does not count.
Fielding
Outfield: 83 catches + 19 run outs (18 direct, 1 assisted) in 259 matches — 0.39 per match.
Batting
Not rated: 183 innings at 8.1 average — below the 20 floor needed to be presented as a batter.
Bowling
245 wickets in 242 matches bowled in (of 259 played) — 1.01 per match at 23.1, economy 3.73, strike rate 37.2.

Fielding — imported matches (259)

83
Ct (field)
1
Ct (WK)
0.32
Catches / match
18
RO (direct)
1
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
103
Total dismissals
0.4
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

1156
Runs (183 inns)
8.08
Avg (adj)
76
Strike rate
42
High score
51
Not outs
9
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

245
Wickets (1520 ov)
3.73
Economy
23.12
Average
242
Maidens
0.25
Extras / over
37.2
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 259 imported
Batting 1156 runs in 183 inns @ 8.08 (SR 76)
Milestones 0×100, 0×50, HS 42, 38 ducks
Bowling 245 wkts @ 23.12 (econ 3.73, SR 37.2)
Best / 5WI 6-32 · 4 five-fors
Fielding 84 ct, 19 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 103 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

0.32
Catches / match
0.4
Dismissals / match

Across 259 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2026/27 4 1 51 33 15.94 100 0 0
2025/26 12 5 45 19 5.31 64.29 0 0
2024/25 14 5 52 16 5.04 54.17 0 0
2023/24 18 3 126 39 8.17 82.35 0 0
2022/23 5 2 64 41* 17.92 87.67 0 0
2021/22 13 3 171 42 16.19 84.24 0 0
2020/21 16 7 61 15* 5.48 55.96 0 0
2019/20 14 6 87 35 8.88 117.57 0 0
2018/19 12 6 41 10* 5.13 62.12 0 0
2017/18 12 4 82 36* 9.11 195.24 0 0
2016/17 13 2 44 15 3.91 488.89 0 0
2015/16 7 0 39 12 5.57 — 0 0
2014/15 10 1 33 15 3.63 — 0 0
2013/14 5 0 16 6 3.2 — 0 0
2012/13 11 3 83 33 9.6 — 0 0
2011/12 9 0 67 22 7.44 — 0 0
2010/11 5 2 62 40* 17.36 — 0 0
2009/10 3 1 32 18* 14.22 — 0 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2026/27 35.8 4 153 7 21.86 4.27 30.7
2025/26 63 2 331 13 25.46 5.25 29.1
2024/25 173 25 804 21 38.29 4.65 49.4
2023/24 158 24 708 28 25.29 4.48 33.9
2022/23 114 25 398 21 18.95 3.49 32.6
2021/22 84.2 6 319 14 22.79 3.79 36.1
2020/21 73.2 8 365 11 33.18 4.99 39.9
2019/20 113.2 19 361 28 12.89 3.19 24.3
2018/19 85.5 14 307 9 34.11 3.59 57
2017/18 88.2 17 304 15 20.27 3.45 35.3
2016/17 88 5 439 14 31.36 4.99 37.7
2015/16 69 6 247 5 49.4 3.58 82.8
2014/15 111 32 279 16 17.44 2.51 41.6
2013/14 66 16 161 9 17.89 2.44 44
2012/13 81 20 210 10 21 2.59 48.6
2011/12 68 9 175 15 11.67 2.57 27.2
2010/11 40 10 74 9 8.22 1.85 26.7
2009/10 9 0 29 0 — 3.22 —

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2026/27 1 0 0 0 1
2025/26 3 0 0 0 3
2024/25 8 0 1 0 9
2023/24 5 0 1 0 6
2022/23 3 0 0 0 3
2021/22 7 0 1 0 8
2020/21 8 0 2 0 10
2019/20 5 0 3 0 8
2018/19 3 0 2 0 5
2017/18 7 0 0 0 7
2016/17 9 0 2 0 11
2015/16 1 0 1 0 2
2014/15 4 0 2 0 6
2013/14 4 1 0 0 5
2012/13 5 0 0 0 5
2011/12 7 0 1 0 8
2010/11 2 0 2 0 4
2009/10 1 0 1 0 2
Pathway benchmark

How does Luke compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Compare with Konstas →

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.