Sumit Nandal

Batting – Top-Order Batter NSW Balanced scorer
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Likely same player — one-click merge
play.cricket
Sumit Nandal
NSW · 2 matches · 25% match
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: Moorebank Cricket Club Ltd · Fairfield-Liverpool Cricket Association - Representative Teams
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Needs Work
7/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Needs Work
9/100
Batting Advance
71/100
Bowling
Not enough data

Representative pathway — 0 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Body of work — 9 imported matches (+0.2)

Critical recommendations

high Batting
Vulnerable to the straight ball

5 of 9 dismissals are bowled/LBW — likely playing across the front pad or leaving a gate. Work on a straighter bat path and head position over the ball.

medium Batting
High duck rate

Out for 0 in 11% of imported innings. Build a repeatable start routine: watch the ball out of the hand, score first run with low-risk pushes.

Strengths

  • ✓ Consistent run-scorer — adjusted average 30.6.
  • ✓ Scores quickly (SR 92.3) without sacrificing consistency.
  • ✓ Proven ability to go big — 1 hundred(s), best of 127.
How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 9 × 40% · Batting 71 × 30% · Bowling not rated (weight redistributed). Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.30 for the level played (Club 9). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
Rated on the last 9 matches since 27 Oct 2024. Older cricket still shows in the career figures but does not count.
Fielding
Outfield: 1 catches + 0 run outs (0 direct, 0 assisted) in 9 matches — 0.11 per match.
Batting
275 runs in 9 innings, adjusted average 30.6, strike rate 92.3. Qualifies on the floors (avg ≥ 20, SR ≥ 40).
Bowling
Not rated: 2 wickets from 6.0 overs across 1 matches bowled in (of 9 played) — 0.22 per match, under the 0.25 floor. Bowls too rarely to judge.

Fielding — imported matches (9)

1
Ct (field)
2
Ct (WK)
0.33
Catches / match
0
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
1
Stumpings
4
Total dismissals
0.44
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

275
Runs (9 inns)
30.56
Avg (adj)
92.26
Strike rate
127
High score
0
Not outs
4
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

2
Wickets (6 ov)
5.67
Economy
17
Average
0
Maidens
0.17
Extras / over
18
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 9 imported
Batting 275 runs in 9 inns @ 30.56 (SR 92.26)
Milestones 1×100, 1×50, HS 127, 1 ducks
Bowling 2 wkts @ 17 (econ 5.67, SR 18)
Best / 5WI 2-34 · 0 five-fors
Fielding 3 ct, 0 RO, 1 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 4 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

0.33
Catches / match
0.44
Dismissals / match

Across 9 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2025/26 9 0 275 127 30.56 177.42 1 1

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2025/26 6 0 34 2 17 5.67 18

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2025/26 1 2 0 1 4
Pathway benchmark

How does Sumit compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.