James Burston

Batting – Top-Order Batter ACT
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: Barton Cricket Club
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Needs Work
6/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Needs Work
29/100
Batting Working on Basics
not rated — working on basics
Bowling
Not enough data

Representative pathway — 1 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Body of work — 52 imported matches (+1.0)

Critical recommendations

medium Batting
Not converting fifties into hundreds

Only 0% of 50+ scores become hundreds (5 fifties, 0 hundreds). Practise batting in long blocks and resetting targets at 50.

info Fielding
Fielding is a selection weapon

0.44 catches per match is elite for this level — keep it visible by taking the hardest catching positions in big games.

Strengths

  • ✓ Safe hands — 23 catches in 52 matches (0.44 per match), a genuine selection asset.
How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 29 × 40% · Batting not rated (weight redistributed) · Bowling not rated (weight redistributed). Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.30 for the level played (Club 52). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
No match in the last 2 years, so not ranked. The rating shown is from the career.
Fielding
Outfield: 23 catches + 0 run outs (0 direct, 0 assisted) in 52 matches — 0.44 per match.
Batting
Not rated: 50 innings at 23.1 average — below the 20 floor needed to be presented as a batter.
Bowling
Not rated: 3 wickets from 25.0 overs across 6 matches bowled in (of 52 played) — 0.06 per match, under the 0.25 floor. Bowls too rarely to judge.

Fielding — imported matches (52)

23
Ct (field)
0
Ct (WK)
0.44
Catches / match
0
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
23
Total dismissals
0.44
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

1033
Runs (50 inns)
23.14
Avg (adj)
128.89
Strike rate
71
High score
6
Not outs
3
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

3
Wickets (25 ov)
5.92
Economy
49.33
Average
0
Maidens
0.16
Extras / over
50
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 52 imported
Batting 1033 runs in 50 inns @ 23.14 (SR 128.89)
Milestones 0×100, 5×50, HS 71, 2 ducks
Bowling 3 wkts @ 49.33 (econ 5.92, SR 50)
Best / 5WI 1-11 · 0 five-fors
Fielding 23 ct, 0 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 23 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

0.44
Catches / match
0.44
Dismissals / match

Across 52 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2011/12 6 0 80 53 13.33 — 1 0
2010/11 16 2 259 48 18.21 — 0 0
2009/10 4 0 35 23 8.75 — 0 0
2008/09 17 4 506 71 36.77 — 3 0
2007/08 2 0 73 58 36.5 162.22 1 0
2006/07 5 0 80 30 16 — 0 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2010/11 2 0 20 0 — 10 —
2009/10 9 0 48 1 48 5.33 54
2008/09 14 0 80 2 40 5.71 42

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2011/12 2 0 0 0 2
2010/11 3 0 0 0 3
2009/10 1 0 0 0 1
2008/09 13 0 0 0 13
2006/07 4 0 0 0 4
Pathway benchmark

How does James compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.