Craig Dunlop

Bowling – Opening Bowler VIC
📈 Journey 📊 Rankings
Merge duplicate records
Search for this player's other accounts and combine them into one player. Records that share a match can never be merged.
Likely same player — one-click merge
play.cricket
Craig Dunlop
— · 18 matches · 25% match
Or search manually:
No players found — check the spelling, or try part of the name.
Records to merge — pick the master
Teams played for
Competitions
Registered with: Dromana Cricket Club · Strathmore Cricket Club
View on play.cricket.com.au ↗
Overall Needs Work
0/100
fielding 40% · bat 30% · bowl 30%
Fielding Needs Work
0/100
Batting Proficient
57/100
Bowling
Not enough data

Representative pathway — 0 pathway points in the overall rating

  • ● Body of work — 9 imported matches (+0.2)

Critical recommendations

medium Batting
High duck rate

Out for 0 in 11% of imported innings. Build a repeatable start routine: watch the ball out of the hand, score first run with low-risk pushes.

medium Bowling
Tight but not threatening

Economy of 2.95 is excellent but a wicket every 75 balls is slow. Develop a genuine wicket-taking variation and attack the stumps more.

Strengths

How these ratings are calculated
Overall
Weighted blend of the disciplines: Fielding 0 × 40% · Batting 57 × 30% · Bowling not rated (weight redistributed). Unrated disciplines are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so a non-bowler is not punished for not bowling.
Level
×0.30 for the level played (Club 9). The same score is worth more in harder cricket.
Form
No match in the last 2 years, so not ranked. The rating shown is from the career.
Fielding
Outfield: 2 catches + 0 run outs (0 direct, 0 assisted) in 9 matches — 0.22 per match.
Batting
154 runs in 9 innings, adjusted average 22.8. Qualifies on the floors (avg ≥ 20, SR ≥ 40).
Bowling
Not rated: 8 wickets from 99.8 overs across 9 matches — 0.89 per match, under the 0.25 floor. Bowls too rarely to judge.

Fielding — imported matches (9)

2
Ct (field)
0
Ct (WK)
0.22
Catches / match
0
RO (direct)
0
RO (assist)
0
Stumpings
2
Total dismissals
0.22
Dismissals / match

Batting — imported matches

154
Runs (9 inns)
22.81
Avg (adj)
—
Strike rate
57
High score
3
Not outs
8
Median position
Century (100+) Fifty (50–99) Not out (under 50) Out (under 50)

Bowling — imported matches

8
Wickets (99.8 ov)
2.95
Economy
36.88
Average
27
Maidens
0
Extras / over
74.9
Strike rate

Dismissal pattern

Imported-match summary

Matches 9 imported
Batting 154 runs in 9 inns @ 22.81 (SR —)
Milestones 0×100, 1×50, HS 57, 1 ducks
Bowling 8 wkts @ 36.88 (econ 2.95, SR 74.9)
Best / 5WI 2-20 · 0 five-fors
Fielding 2 ct, 0 RO, 0 st
All figures from imported scorecards only.

Further analysis

Batting form

Running not-out-adjusted average across innings (chronological).

Score distribution

How often each scoring band is reached — a read on consistency.

Scoring tempo

Runs vs balls faced per innings; line = a strike rate of 100.

Bowling form

Economy per spell (chronological) with the career economy as a baseline.

Wicket accumulation

Cumulative wickets across spells — the shape of their wicket-taking.

Fielding contribution

Breakdown of the 2 dismissals they were involved in.

Per-match fielding rate

0.22
Catches / match
0.22
Dismissals / match

Across 9 imported match(es).

Season by season

Seasons run 1 September – 31 August. Imported scorecards only.

Batting

Season Inns NO Runs HS Avg SR 50 100
2015/16 1 1 57 57* 57 — 1 0
2011/12 1 0 5 5 5 — 0 0
2010/11 3 1 31 17* 13.78 — 0 0
2009/10 1 0 20 20 20 — 0 0
2008/09 1 1 18 18* 18 — 0 0
2007/08 1 0 12 12 12 — 0 0
2006/07 1 0 11 11 11 — 0 0

Bowling

Season Overs Mdns Runs Wkts Avg Econ SR
2015/16 4 0 25 1 25 6.25 24
2011/12 21 5 64 4 16 3.05 31.5
2010/11 33 12 73 0 — 2.21 —
2009/10 6 0 13 0 — 2.17 —
2008/09 19.8 7 60 2 30 3.03 59.5
2007/08 14 2 56 1 56 4 84
2006/07 2 1 4 0 — 2 —

Fielding

Season Ct WK Ct RO St Dismissals
2011/12 1 0 0 0 1
2010/11 1 0 0 0 1
Pathway benchmark

How does Craig compare?

Year-by-year, aligned by age — against Sam Konstas or any player you pick.

Flag it for review — duplicate records that should be one player, or numbers that look wrong. It joins a queue; nothing changes straight away.